Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.paranet.ufo    |    Network of UFO fanatical nutjobs    |    11,639 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 11,166 of 11,639    |
|    Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S to All    |
|    =?windows-1252?Q?The_True_Cost_Of_Americ    |
|    04 May 13 20:50:54    |
      5e50cd92       XPost: alt.alien.visitors, alt.alien.research, alt.astronomy       XPost: alt.conspiracy       From: garymatalucci@gmail.com              The True Cost Of America’s Wars              During his speech on Afghanistan June 22, President Obama revealed       that “Over the last decade, we have spent a trillion dollars on war.”       He knew this was a deceptive understatement, as did everyone who keeps       close watch on the Bush-Obama wars all these years. Few Americans ,       however, have closely followed Washington’s 21st century wars of       choice, so a trillion probably sounds right to them, but that amount       in 10 years — when the annual cost of air conditioning alone for the       U.S. in Afghanistan and Iraq amounts to $20.2 billion a year — is way       off base.              (It’s difficult to conceive of one trillion, so we’ll repeat a method       we’ve used before: Sixty seconds comprise a minute. One million       seconds comes out to be about 11½ days. A billion seconds is 32       years. And a trillion seconds is 32,000 years.)              The latest objective estimate for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan,       made public June 29, is between $3.7 trillion and $4.4 trillion       (140,800 years), according to the research project “Costs of War” by       Brown University’s Watson Institute for International Studies. The       university assembled a team of economists, anthropologists, political       scientists, legal experts, and a physician to do this analysis, which       included future costs for veterans care and interest on war debts to       be paid over the next few decades.              The medical costs are huge. “While we know how many U.S. soldiers have       died in the wars (just over 6,000),” the report pointed out, “what is       startling is what we don’t know about the levels of injury and illness       in those who have returned from the wars. New disability claims       continue to pour into the VA, with 550,000 just through last fall.”       This doesn’t even include the thousands of deaths and injuries among       quasi-military contractors. There are about as many contractors as       troops in Iraq and Afghanistan. It’s impossible to precisely predict       the interest costs on these wars. In 2010, $400 billion of our tax       money went toward paying off past war debts as far back as the Korean       War of the early 1950s. We’ll pay war debts indefinitely because       Washington is always borrowing to plan for or start new wars. So far,       the U.S.-led NATO war for regime change in Libya is costing American       taxpayers about a billion. The Pentagon has blueprints ready for many       different kinds of future wars, from small counter-terrorism       escapades, to cyberspace and outer space conflicts, to nuclear war,       all the way up to World War III.              The Brown University figures may turn out to be underestimates. A few       independent studies over the years have been somewhat higher but were       brushed aside by the White House and the mass media. This may happen       to the Brown calculations as well. The respected Nobel Prize-winning       economist Joseph Stiglitz and Harvard Professor Linda Bilmes wrote a       book three years ago estimating the cost of the Iraq war only, based       on data collected in 2006. It was titled “The Three Trillion Dollar       War.” They based their calculations on the “hidden” costs of the war       that include enormous medical care expenses over the next 50 years for       tens of thousands of badly wounded soldiers, other benefits, equipment       replacement, and interest on war debts.              Stiglitz and Bilmes calculated in 2008 that the combined cost of the       Iraq and Afghanistan wars would be between $5 and $7 trillion. They       called these adventures the “credit card wars.” Using a somewhat       different methodology a few years ago, the Joint Economic Committee of       Congress, estimated the Iraq war ultimately will cost $3.5 trillion.       They didn’t include the Afghan war. Assuming Obama is reelected, the       Bush-Obama wars — including Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen (and       Somalia, where the U.S. is now engaged in drone strikes), plus the       wars in Obama’s final years — will certainly top $5 trillion in real       costs.              In this connection, we cannot forget that current Pentagon spending of       around $700 billion a year represents a huge increase since 2001, when       it totaled about $380 billion. (By comparison, during this same time       period, military spending by Iran — portrayed by Washington, Tel-Aviv       and Saudi Arabia as the greatest danger to peace in the Middle East —       dropped from $9 billion in 2001 to $7 billion in 2010.) But Defense       Department expenses are only half the story. Double the Pentagon’s       $700 billion for a true estimate of the amount of money the U.S. spent       on war-related issues last year. That’s $1.4 trillion a year for the       United States. How is this possible?              Instead of just discussing the Pentagon budget, it is essential to       also consider Washington’s various other “national security” budgets.       That of course includes the costs of Washington’s 16 different       intelligence services, the percentage of the annual national debt to       pay for past war expenses, Homeland Security, nuclear weapons,       additional annual spending requests for Iraq and Afghan wars, military       retiree pay and healthcare for vets, NASA, FBI (for its war-related       military work), etc. When it’s all included it comes to $1,398       trillion for fiscal 2010, according to the War Resisters League and       other sources. It’s not enough just to take note of the money       Washington spent on stalemated wars of imperial choice. It’s fruitful       to contemplate where our $5 trillion Bush-Obama war funding might have       been invested instead. It could have paid for a fairly swift       transition from fossil fuels to a solar-wind energy system for the       entire U.S. — a prospect that will now take many decades longer, if at       all, as the world gets warmer from greenhouse gases. And there       probably would have been enough left to overhaul America’s decaying       and outdated civil infrastructure, among other projects.              But while the big corporations, Wall Street and the wealthy are       thriving, global warming and infrastructure repair have been brushed       aside. States are cutting back on schools and healthcare. Counties and       towns are closing summer swimming pools and public facilities. Jobs       and growth are stagnant. The federal government is sharply cutting the       social service budget, and Medicare et al. are nearing the chopping       block. During his Afghan speech, President Obama also declared that       “we take comfort in knowing that the tide of war is receding.”              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca