Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.paranet.ufo    |    Network of UFO fanatical nutjobs    |    11,639 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 11,502 of 11,639    |
|    MrPostingRobot@kymhorsell.com to All    |
|    ufo's and sea surface temperatures (1/2)    |
|    10 Mar 21 08:02:25    |
      XPost: alt.ufo.reports              EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:       - In the on-going hunt for (remote) locations with a strong connection        with observed UFO activity, we look at daily sea surface        temperatures correlated against daily UFO sightings.       - All major strong correlations lay in the S Hem in approx the 40S        band. The strongest responses are found in a region around Easter Is.       - The only significant response from the N Hem is "Atlantis" -- a        point equi-distant from N Am, Europe and Greenland.       - On the Antarctic coast the only significant response is a volcanic        coastal region so remote it remains unclaimed by any country.                     We've seen in previous posts that UFO activity seems to vary as sea-ice       changes in certain key areas of the Arctic. They strength of the       association from place to place across the polar region seems to pick       out a path between N Russia and the NW of N America.              We can imagine that if at least some UFO's represent a group of       ultra-terrestrials that are based underwater around the N pole then       thick sea ice might affect their travel plans between home and remote       parts of the world they may be inclined to visit. There is a simple       "mental model" that relates sea-ice and any change we might see in UFO       sighting data. More ice == harder travel.              This kind of relationship might be expected in other location-based       data e.g. cloud cover, temperature, rainfall, etc albeit it might be       harder to see why some of these might be inclined to affect how many       sightings of various objects are seen across N Am or other parts of       the world.              But if a strong correlation exists and seems localized to a small part       of the world some such affect is likely to be operating regardless of       whether the causal chain is obvious.              The patterns of which regions "light up" might still be informative       and/or look like patterns we have already seen. Enough of this and we       might suspect the regions where local weather effects seem to robustly       predict changes in UFO sightings some time later *might* be associated       with bases of operation of Our Friends (TM; not necessarily our friends).              We've looked at daily seaice data (as proxied by radar returns to       orbiting satellites). Let's take a look at sea surface temperatures as       measured by orbiting infra-red detecting satellites. These are similar       to radar data available on a daily basis. I scrounge mine from the       Australian BoM and have daily measurements from pole to pole since 2015.              As per the NOAA radar data this work will involve pixel-picking to       create a sea surface temperature time series for each small region of       the world, then robustly correlating each series against daily UFO       sightings (as usual I'm using the NUFORC data here).              Similarly with other data crunching of this type, the s/w is tuned to       discard suspicious-looking inputs rather than try to correct or       interpolate from other "quality" datapoints. If a region seems to be       suspiciously constant over the period 2015-2020 it will be ignored and       a "zero correlation" returned for that region to put on our summary map.              The results are available at |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca