Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.paranet.ufo    |    Network of UFO fanatical nutjobs    |    11,639 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 11,518 of 11,639    |
|    MrPostingRobot@kymhorsell.com to All    |
|    predicting UFO sightings from satellite     |
|    08 Jun 21 22:28:53    |
      EXECUTIVE SUMMARY       - A simple neural net (NN) is created to predict in advance California        monthly UFO sightings as per NUFORC database. Some adjustments were        made to allow for the intro of a web report form in approx March 2006.       - The input data are planetary positions as per an ephemeris nominally        tuned to 2000-2050 but supposedly of reasonable accuracy back to        1950. Other data include surface temperature measures from ground        stations and satellites (the JMA gridded monthly dataset).       - The model is able to predict monthly California UFO sightings 12m in        advance to an accuracy of around +-2. In particular, the NN is        trained to predict "outliers" or UFO sighting clusters in preference        to the mundane seasonal month-to-month average counts. But it seems to        perform adequately for all months in the data.       - Similar models built to predict sightings in other US states were        not always as successful although many were. It seems some US states        generate sightings similar to "white noise". This does not mean        those data are "junk" and all California sightings are "something".        The model is not built to decide whether a particular predicted        sighting is the result of "weather", "alcoholic haze", or "unusual        physical object".       - Further work is in train to produce an annual or monthly UFO        prediction s/w that might be useful to pre-position or at least        anticipate UFO reports from certain regions up to 12m in advance.                     This article is a outline of a very simple neural network that       predicts UFO sightings from sat-based surface temperature data and an       ephemeris of various planetary positions.              These data were not chosen because they are the best correlates of UFO       sightings data, but because they are reliably curated and updated by       govt agencies around the world and will provide a continuing quality       data stream into the future. The ephemeris data is generated by a       program distilled from tabulated data that can also be updated into       the future and also can be zoomed into hour by hour resolution if       necessary. Supposedly the Dec and RA for the planets in the dataset       are accurate to within a couple of arc minutes. Adequate for our       purposes here.              The s/w -- simulating a simple "brain" about the size of a sea squirt       (~200 neurons) -- takes a large set of monthly time series from the       online datasets and is trained to predict UFO sightings for California       from 1950-present as given by the NUFORC database. The present set-up       predicts sightings 12 months into the future. I.e. given data upto the       end of 2020 we can use the s/w to predict UFO activity in California       upto the end of 2021.              It turns out these sightings can be predicted to high precision given       they are only month by month resolution. The training procedure finds       the final error is within +-2 sightings for each month. In particular       the error band applies to many of the "flaps" or sightings clusters       that have been seen in Cal from 1950.              We can not decide just here whether the "weather data" or the "planet       data" has a larger influence on the accuracy of the predictions. In       any case, simply building a "good predictor" can't tell you who is       operating the UFO objects (or whatever) in question or whether some       large fraction of the sightings are e.g. weather-induced       hallucinations of some kind.              But it quite interesting the input data chosen can predict the       "outliers" so well.              Here's a sample of the "observed" versus "predicted" California       sightings since 2000:              Date of data Adjusted(*) NUFORC sightings for California        for 1 year later       YYYY.MM OBS PRED       2000.04 44 44       2000.12 55 55       2000.21 44 44       2000.29 55 55       2000.38 44 44       2000.46 110 110       2000.54 110 109 <- prediction too low by 1       2000.62 55 55       2000.71 131 131       2000.79 66 65 <- 1       2000.88 55 54 <- 2       2000.96 55 55       2001.04 55 54       2001.12 44 44       2001.21 44 44       2001.29 22 22       2001.38 55 56       2001.46 88 88       2001.54 44 43       2001.62 88 88       2001.71 55 55       2001.79 44 44       2001.88 55 55       2001.96 22 21       2002.04 44 43       2002.12 22 21       2002.21 22 22       2002.29 55 55       2002.38 44 44       2002.46 66 66       2002.54 88 88       2002.62 66 66       2002.71 44 44       2002.79 44 43       2002.88 55 55       2002.96 55 55       2003.04 55 56       2003.12 22 21       2003.21 22 22       2003.29 110 109 <-- predicts cluster       2003.38 66 66       2003.46 153 153 <-- predicts cluster       2003.54 66 66       2003.62 22 22       2003.71 88 88       2003.79 88 88       2003.88 22 22       2003.96 22 22       2004.04 44 44       2004.12 22 21       2004.21 44 45       2004.29 88 88       2004.38 44 44       2004.46 131 131 <-- predicts cluster       2004.54 153 153 <-- predicts cluster       2004.62 66 66       2004.71 22 22       2004.79 66 65       2004.88 66 65       2004.96 55 55       2005.04 44 44       2005.12 131 131 <-- predicts cluster       2005.21 11 11       2005.29 33 33       2005.38 36 36       2005.46 34 34       2005.54 62 62       2005.62 52 52       2005.71 44 44       2005.79 44 44       2005.88 54 54       2005.96 66 66       2006.04 55 55       2006.12 31 31       2006.21 59 59       2006.29 36 36       2006.38 30 30       2006.46 46 47       2006.54 57 57       2006.62 50 50       2006.71 42 42       2006.79 48 48       2006.88 70 70       2006.96 58 58       2007.04 72 71       2007.12 52 52       2007.21 49 49       2007.29 59 59       2007.38 44 44       2007.46 65 65       2007.54 38 38       2007.62 54 54       2007.71 57 57       2007.79 77 77       2007.88 83 83       2007.96 50 50       2008.04 98 97       2008.12 61 60       2008.21 47 47       2008.29 30 30       2008.38 34 34       2008.46 55 55       2008.54 65 65       2008.62 66 66       2008.71 54 54       2008.79 42 42       2008.88 43 44       2008.96 44 44       2009.04 52 52       2009.12 30 30       2009.21 33 33       2009.29 38 38       2009.38 42 43       2009.46 42 42       2009.54 78 78       2009.62 63 63       2009.71 67 67       2009.79 52 51       2009.88 57 57       2009.96 41 41       2010.04 46 46       2010.12 54 53       2010.21 42 42       2010.29 52 51       2010.38 39 38       2010.46 37 37       2010.54 60 60       2010.62 70 70       2010.71 47 47       2010.79 55 55       2010.88 50 50       2010.96 65 66       2011.04 63 63       2011.12 35 34       2011.21 48 48       2011.29 57 57       2011.38 51 51       2011.46 79 79       2011.54 69 69       2011.62 75 75       2011.71 70 70       2011.79 73 73       2011.88 71 71       2011.96 60 59       2012.04 40 40       2012.12 45 45       2012.21 52 52       2012.29 53 53       2012.38 56 56       2012.46 58 58       2012.54 67 67       2012.62 64 64       2012.71 61 61       2012.79 57 57       2012.88 64 64       2012.96 102 102 <-- predicts cluster       2013.04 90 89       2013.12 73 72       2013.21 61 61       2013.29 77 77       2013.38 60 60       2013.46 80 80       2013.54 72 72       2013.62 79 79       2013.71 66 66       2013.79 68 67       2013.88 55 55       2013.96 67 67       2014.04 60 60       2014.12 39 40       2014.21 45 46       2014.29 34 34       2014.38 36 36       2014.46 34 34       2014.54 53 53       2014.62 48 48       2014.71 73 74       2014.79 72 73       2014.88 250 251 <-- predicts cluster       2014.96 50 51       2015.04 38 39       2015.12 64 65       2015.21 38 39       2015.29 34 34       2015.38 23 23       2015.46 49 50       2015.54 91 91       2015.62 51 51       2015.71 63 64       2015.79 40 41       2015.88 42 42       2015.96 36 36       2016.04 31 31       2016.12 34 34       2016.21 33 33       2016.29 51 51       2016.38 47 47       2016.46 37 37       2016.54 48 48       2016.62 46 46       2016.71 48 48       2016.79 58 58       2016.88 46 47       2016.96 95 95       2017.04 34 34       2017.12 42 42       2017.21 20 21       2017.29 16 16       2017.38 23 23       2017.46 10 11       2017.54 36 36       2017.62 32 32       2017.71 25 25              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca