Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.paranet.ufo    |    Network of UFO fanatical nutjobs    |    11,639 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 11,523 of 11,639    |
|    MrPostingRobot@kymhorsell.com to All    |
|    ufos and missing persons (3/n) (1/3)    |
|    04 Aug 21 23:24:35    |
      EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:       - We use a state-by-state list of number of missing people in 2019 to        determine which types of UFO activity appear to closely correlate.       - We also check some other interesting state demographics along with        the UFO activity.       - It seems some UFO types are related to increased number of missing        people; other types are robustly related to lower levels of missing        persons.       - At the same type HH firearms do not seem to reduce missing persons;        in some cases they may act as an "attractant". Perhaps those states        with a history of missing people are the ones that arm up.       - The number of Army bases in a state seems to have no effect on        missing persons related to some types of UFO activity. But other        types of UFO activity in the presence of Army bases seems to be        reduced.       - The presence of AFB have a similar spread as Army bases. Except some        types of UFO activity in the presence of AFB is seen to increase for        reasons unknown but maybe suspected. The surprise part is this is        2019 missing persons data, not 1960.                     The data-scanning part of my s/w has managed to find a list of missing       people by US state. After downloading all the public FBI reports some       time back it seemed noone broke them down that way.              But someone must.              And this allows us to re-run some correlation studies to see if we can       find robust relationship between UFO activity over the US and volumes       of missing people -- even if it's only for the one year (2019).              So this won't be like most of the other studies where I want to ask       what data the s/w has on hand strongly correlates with this list of       missing person data; we want to just set up a model that involves some       of the things we've found in the past relate robustly to missing       persons and see what part UFO's play in that across the 50 states in       the dataset.              The summary information -- using the total UFO count between 2006 and       2020 per capita from NUFORC for each state -- looks like:              MODEL:       y = 1.28141*x + 22.951       beta in 1.28141 +- 0.50456 90% CI       alpha in 22.951 +- 11.7025       T-test: P(beta>0.000000) = 0.999952       Rank test: calculated Spearman corr = 0.507347       Critical Spearman = 0.432000 2-sided at 1%; reject H0:not_connected       r2 = 0.27868947              Data:       State #UFOs pc #missing pc model-predicted missing pc       TX 7.82697 45.36 32.9806       New.York 8.84026 30.6126 34.279       Louisiana 8.99218 56.9505 34.4737*       Illinois 10.4977 24.6501 36.4029       Maryland 10.8218 30.4675 36.8182       Mississippi 11.0282 38.4316 37.0826       Alabama 11.3193 41.9841 37.4557       Kansas 12.0207 27.8194 38.3544       Iowa 12.1643 27.5297 38.5384       Michigan 12.2952 56.0338 38.7062       California 12.5943 54.49 39.0895       Georgia 13.8034 24.4741 40.6388       Delaware 14.8002 61.3151 41.9161       North.Carolina 15.2348 32.5606 42.473       Ohio 15.3271 30.8264 42.5913       Massachusetts 15.601 18.5446 42.9423*       Nebraska 15.8212 32.1698 43.2244       Virginia 16.104 28.5101 43.5868       New.Jersey 16.2983 33.3779 43.8358       Kentucky 16.4968 56.044 44.0901       Indiana 16.6171 26.2853 44.2443       Pennsylvania 16.7936 31.322 44.4705       Oklahoma 16.874 64.4281 44.5735       Tennessee 17.2719 54.6945 45.0834       Florida 17.4138 61.7623 45.2652       Arkansas 17.4602 67.1546 45.3247*(1sd under)       South.Dakota 17.473 26.7919 45.3411       North.Dakota 18.4958 40.9551 46.6517       Missouri 19.8893 51.9423 48.4373       West.Virginia 20.0637 65.0714 48.6608       Colorado 20.5257 53.5134 49.2528       South.Carolina 21.4454 37.5806 50.4313       Minnesota 22.406 32.6071 51.6622       Wisconsin 22.8717 25.8172 52.259*       Nevada 23.5225 66.4166 53.0929       Connecticut 25.0635 54.8611 55.0676       Utah 27.0368 35.7153 57.5962*       Washington 27.6137 89.6748 58.3354*       New.Hampshire 30.0614 26.3038 61.4719*       Rhode.Island 30.2945 18.9341 61.7706**       Oregon 31.2734 107.223 63.025**       Arizona 31.6341 134.006 63.4872**(2sd under obs)       Hawaii 33.5288 74.7414 65.9151       Wyoming 34.1235 76.7778 66.6771       Vermont 35.1414 86.2562 67.9815       New.Mexico 39.3265 68.5815 73.3443       Maine 41.3743 81.2441 75.9684       Idaho 44.7149 61.0298 80.249       Montana 50.3413 68.7352 87.4588                     Which (considering this is posting #3) renews the apparently robust       link between UFO activity/sightings and missing persons. Previously       links were over time -- a number of years of FBI reports -- but this       one is for one year across the various states.              We see for each UFO sighted in a state about 1 person is reported       missing (1.3+-.5).              2 stats tests were done on the data. A T-test to make sure the       relevant \beta was too +ve to be just due to chance. The s/w       calculates there's less than 1 chance in 10 it could be so large just       by luck.              And a 2nd non-parametric rank test was done and also found the order       of states by UFO sightings and by missing person numbers was far too       similar to be just luck.              Together, we have something like 1 chance in 1000 or less the link is       just due to luck.              There is 99.9% something going on.              So far this is pretty much what we found before. We recall with the       FBI data we could also check each of the missing persons categories       and find the link was robust for some types of missing person       (e.g. juveniles) but not for others (dementia cases). And we also       checked the same pattern broadly was seen in UK and AUS missing data.              But we can now push on and check which UFO types are "most strongly       linked" and maybe add a couple other things to the mix like the number       of army and AF bases in each state, and maybe the% of       households with firearms. How do all these things together affect       missing person numbers in each state?              Most of what you expect is seen. There is one surprise. Or maybe not.              I've run each UFO type NUFORC keeps track of. The types are assigned       by the curators of the data rather than witnesses. We can thank them       for that. :)                     [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca