Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.paranet.ufo    |    Network of UFO fanatical nutjobs    |    11,639 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 11,549 of 11,639    |
|    MrPostingRobot@kymhorsell.com to All    |
|    uses of detection networks: ufos and cov    |
|    05 May 22 10:17:24    |
      EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:       - We re-visit the links between UFO sightings and covid across the US,        this time via detections reported in the NUFORC's "MADAR" network.       - Automatic detectors avoid problems associated with observer        behavior. Detectors (nominally) operate 24/7 and don't take a break        because of wet weather.       - We find there is a statistically strong +ve link between MADAR        detections -- adjusted by number of stations installed in a state --        and that state's total covid cases up to the end of 2021.       - It's hard to escape the conclusion that some segment of UFO activity        may be related to the pandemic. A more detailed looks shows there is        at least one unambiguous strong suspect UFO type responsible for the        +ve link, while there may also be other UFO types linked with        reducing levels of covid.       - If patterns persist the next peak in cases is to be expected around        mid June. A 100-day cycle in peaks may be related to parameters of        the virus but also suspiciously coincides with motions of a certain        rocky inner planet.                     We've looked at the NUFORC's "MADAR" network before. It's known that       at least some UFO's disturb the local geomagnetics enough to detect,       and the group has built and installed 100s of magnetic detectors       across the US in the past 2-3 years.              By my count the state-by-state setup looks like:              State Number of MADAR stations        (as at end 2021)       Alabama 1       Arizona 4       Arkansas 4       California 7       Colorado 9       Connecticut 4       Florida 6       Georgia 7       Idaho 1       Illinois 5       Indiana 12       Iowa 1       Kansas 4       Kentucky 2       Maine 1       Maryland 2       Massachusetts 3       Michigan 2       Minnesota 1       Missouri 7       Montana 1       Nevada 1       New.Hampshire 1       New.Jersey 4       New.Mexico 2       New.York 12       North.Carolina 1       North.Dakota 1       Ohio 12       Oklahoma 1       Oregon 1       Pennsylvania 10       Rhode.Island 1       South.Carolina 1       Tennessee 2       Texas 5       Utah 1       Virginia 1       Washington 9              The beauty part of such public transparent science -- USAF please note       -- is the data gathered by this kind of groundwork has unpredictable       and unbounded applications.              While the instruments may be limited in various ways, the main point       I'd like to underline in this study is they run (nominally :) 24/7 and       don't likely rely in the patterns of daily travel or observation of the       sky other UFO sightings are subject to. While they may not detect       every kind of UFO or every UFO within a state they at least behave       relatively consistently. And this can be a vital leg-up for various       kinds of data analysis.              With UFO sighting reports from citizens there is always the problem of       trying to extract characteristics of the sightings that relate to the       behaviour of the objects in question themselves, and the factors       affecting the observers. If we find there are more sightings in cold       weather we can't be entirely sure weather is affecting UFO's somehow       -- maybe they don't work so well in cold air -- or it's simply a       matter of people staying indoors in cold weather and being less able       or inclined to look at things buzzing around in the skies.              With instruments that (somewhat!) goes away. While there is an issue       with the growth in the numbers and placement of detectors, at a first       approximation we can assume the detector events over the past couple       of years are relatively consistent. If the MADAR network says there       were more detections in a certain month we can be fairly sure there       were more UFO's in those months rather than just being the result of       people being more likely outside and looking up in those months.              And this assumption can allow us to examine things that are difficult       to look at otherwise.              Take the possible link between the COVID pandemic and UFO activity.       We have earlier noted there are suspicious robust statistical links       between covid cases in the US and elsewhere and UFO activity as       mostly witnessed across N America. In regions with more UFO sightings       there have generally been more covid cases, for example. More UFO       sightings are also linked strongly to covid cases per capita. In       month's with more UFO sightings there are generally more new covid       cases. But we also find that if we look at UFO sightings in a state       per capita there are still strong links with covid per capita but the       relationship switches sign from +ve to -ve.              There is a typical analysis dilemma caused by confounding factors.       The population of a state is linked with both sightings and covid       cases. It seems there is also a link between population and rate of       covid cases per capita.              While we can try to adjust data all to per capita terms that does not       solve any problems. Because population can interact with UFO sightings       in more than one way.              If we example state populations and UFO sightings we find that       sightings of some kinda of objects grow slower than linearly.       Typically, expressed as a power low, the power relating population and       sightings is less than or much less than 1.              IOW somehow larger states "repl" UFO sightings.              The problem only gets more complex when we consider the totality of       sightings is the sum of all the different categories we can divide UFO       sightings into. Each group potentially reacts differently to state       populations.              But with the MADAR data a lot of this (to a first approximation! :)       goes away.              If we compare state by state MADAR sightings (adjusted for the number       of detectors in each state) against e.g. total covid cases per capita       we find something like the following:              States like: Av MADAR sightings av total covid Model estimate        per station cases per mn cap covid cases per mn        2020-2021 as at end 2021       Rhode.Island 1 127603 120198       Virginia 3 106622 124098*       New.Mexico 3.80476 135394 125667       Texas 4.7375 132702 127486       Oregon 5.90178 110008 129756*       Iowa 6.98148 144279 131861       Missouri 8.34524 108941 134521*       Washington 9.5 136411 136772       Arizona 10.5 156534 138722*       Minnesota 11 124612 139697       Michigan 11.625 137830 140916       Montana 13 136831 143597       South.Carolina 15 169574 147497*       North.Dakota 18 166486 153346       Idaho 26 147175 168946*       (ordered by MADAR column).              The states have been binned by the MADAR sightings. States within +-2       MADAR events per station are averaged in the same line/bin with the       named state just one of those in the same bin.              The output from the stats program looks like:              y = 1949.91*x + 118248       beta in 1949.91 +- 1193.4 (90% CI)       alpha in 118248 +- 14232.8       T-test: P(beta>0.000000) = 0.993918       Rank test: calculated Spearman corr = 0.735294              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca