Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.paranet.ufo    |    Network of UFO fanatical nutjobs    |    11,639 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 11,550 of 11,639    |
|    MrPostingRobot@kymhorsell.com to All    |
|    ufos and unexplained amnesia (1/3)    |
|    17 May 22 23:24:34    |
      EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:       - We examine an interesting category of FBI missing people --        unidentified but living". Most unidentified missing people are just        bodies or body parts discovered various places. But the FBI also        has a category of people found alive but unable to say who they        are. I'll use the mental model "amnesia" here.       - While the category shows strong statistical links with the "usual        suspects" using previously-described s/w -- variables like        Antarctic temperatures, phytoplankton blooming in the Southern        Ocean, positions of Saturn, mid-Atlantic earthquakes, etc. -- we ramp        up the pressure here to make sure the links are validated. I.e. 1/3        of the data is used to estimate the relevant link and then the other        2/3 of the data is checked to ensure it has the same link.       - On top of that we removing all seasonal and annual trends and cycles        from all the data to leave what can be thought of as "noise" or the        data's "fingerprint". If the fingerprint of X is also found in Y it        suggests the link between the 2 is rather stronger than just an        "association" and possibly of the "causes" type.       - We find certain UFO types seem to be causally connected with amnesia        cases found by the FBI. It also seems some links are -ve meaning        some UFO types may be "friendly".       - But overall we must remember just as UFO's are a complex combination        of phenomena -- "not just the one thing" -- even individual        categories are likely to have a lot of complexity. In a human        community some people do some things and some do the opposite. We        can't judge individuals just from the average for the whole community.                     I was interested to see some comments from Luis Elizondo about cases       reported to the secret UFO unit he led concerning military people that       had been kidnapped by UFOs.              We've taken a look at the civilian data from the FBI that suggests       there is some connection between UFO activity and certain types of FBI       missing persons cases -- of which there are 10s of 1000s every year.              But here I'd like to look at one very special category the FBI is       interested in. Persons found wandering around and unable to remember       who they are.              While we can assume there are sometimes reasons people WANT to forget       or pretend to forget who they are and what they have done, we'll just       let the stats sort out whether there is some connection between these       cases -- usually 20-30 per year since at least 2015 -- and UFO       activity across the US.              And we'll tighten the elastic bands on our stats programs to try to       make it absolutely sure there is a connection far beyond the certainty       usually provided by simple statistical tests.              But how do we ensure some "X" really is the cause of some "Y"?              This is a growing hot topic in data science and there are a growing       set of methods to determine causation.              I will use a grab bag of them here, starting with the ideas first       introduced in the Surgeon General's report that linked cancer and       smoking. In that report it was suggests that 3 things must be true if       X causes Y. First, if X changes at time T then sometime later Y must       change. Second, if Y changes at time T then X must have changed before       that. And third, in states or age-groups or other ways of categorizing       the data with different levels of X there must be commensurate values       for Y.              Part of this is handled by the idea of "cross validation" in       statistical model building. The idea is to take part of the data to       determine relevant trends, and then see if that same trend explains       equally well parts of the data that were not involved in estimating       the trend.              My s/w does an even more extreme thing. It divides time series into 3       equal parts. It uses the middle part to estimate trends and then       checks that the same trend is seen in the first and third parts --       i.e. it makes sure the model "back casts" and "fore casts" results not       seen when estimating the model.              To make it even more solid we wont just use the original data. We will       manipulate it to extract JUST THE NOISE.              The idea here is that the noise in a data series is like a       "fingerprint". In humans and animals most of the cell's DNA is       "noise" and even identical twins have different so-called "junk DNA".              So if X causes Y then we would expect the noise part of X should also       end up being part of the noise inside the Y data.       (I came across a similar idea when working on a production line as a       teenager. Working a machine with unfamiliar controls and very little       instruction from the foreman I found I could get a handle on what knob       caused what action of the machine by flicking the knobs and levels to       their max and min extent. Throwing a level to the extreme top quickly       tells you what is connected with it; then throwing the level to the       extreme bottom confirms the connection if the same thing moves to its       opposite extreme. Don't worry. Companies are insured for this kind of       thing :).              If some X and Y passes all these tests we might argue it is highly       suggestive of a causal link.              The data for the FBI's "unidentified and living" category that       features people that generally can't remember who they are (the rest       of the unidentified are dead bodies or body parts -- and we will look       at this part of the data sometime when I'm not eating) from 2015-2021       which are available online from the FBI looks like:              year.mo Num of new unident living/amnesia cases       2015.04 15       2015.12 25       2015.21 15       2015.29 25       2015.38 15       2015.46 35       2015.54 15       2015.62 15       2015.71 25       2015.79 15       2015.88 15       2015.96 15       2016.04 11       2016.12 21       2016.21 14       2016.29 11       2016.38 12       2016.46 15       2016.54 20       2016.62 9       2016.71 11       2016.79 17       2016.88 16       2016.96 9       2017.04 10       2017.12 19       2017.21 10       2017.29 17       2017.38 12       2017.46 19       2017.54 26       2017.62 22       2017.71 19       2017.79 22       2017.88 15       2017.96 16       2018.04 9       2018.12 16       2018.21 18       2018.29 13       2018.38 20       2018.46 21       2018.54 15       2018.62 14       2018.71 11       2018.79 25       2018.88 23       2018.96 14       2019.04 12       2019.12 18       2019.21 17       2019.29 29       2019.38 28       2019.46 17       2019.54 14       2019.62 23       2019.71 20       2019.79 10       2019.88 21       2019.96 17       2020.04 25       2020.12 12       2020.21 27       2020.29 11       2020.38 23       2020.46 15       2020.54 10       2020.62 26       2020.71 31       2020.79 40       2020.88 24       2020.96 14       2021.04 27       2021.12 19       2021.21 29       2021.29 17       2021.38 22       2021.46 27       2021.54 28       2021.62 38       2021.71 36       2021.79 33       2021.88 13       2021.96 22                     [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca