XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.atheism, alt.religion.christianity   
   XPost: alt.ufo.reports   
   From: jtem01@gmail.com   
      
   On 7/1/25 2:17 PM, Vincent Maycock wrote:   
      
   > I think she was just saying you don't need evidence against something   
   > (that isn't known to exist) in order to reject it.   
      
   It's a declaration. It's not an argument it's not even logical.   
      
   Abiogenesis isn't known to exist. In fact, every last abiogenesis   
   hypothesis that has ever been tested was falsified. That would be   
   be powerful evidence AGAINST existing, not merely a lack of   
   evidence for. Yet the collective rudely defends abiogenesis as   
   fact.   
      
   Stop confusing rationalizations for a valid opinion.   
      
      
      
   --   
   https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)