Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.paranormal    |    The paranormal and unexplained    |    34,291 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 32,407 of 34,291    |
|    Dawn Flood to JTEM    |
|    Re: Lighthouse of Alexandria really quit    |
|    10 Jul 25 08:28:28    |
      XPost: alt.atheism       From: Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com              On 7/10/2025 7:54 AM, JTEM wrote:       >       >       > With blocks weighing as much as 80 tons, the lighthouse of       > Alexandria turns out to have been quite heavy:       >       > https://allthatsinteresting.com/lighthouse-of-alexandria-remains       >       > The lighthouse of Alexandria occupies a very odd place in our       > understanding of the world. I mean, it's pure legend yet historical       > fact. At least we assume it's historical fact.       >       > It's not like these stones are marked "Property of the Lighthouse       > of Alexandria. If found, please return to the Lighthouse of       > Alexandria."       >       > It's kind of circular: We believe there was a lighthouse hence       > anything we pull up is a piece of the lighthouse, and the piece       > of the lighthouse confirms the existence of the lighthouse...       > which is what identified the blocks as pieces of the lighthouse       > that they confirm...       >       > How do we really know what is legend and what is not?       >       > Well. In this case, the story lacks magic. Lighthouses are       > known, even from ancient times, and nobody attributes gods or       > UFOs or unicorns to it so, what's not to believe?       >       > At the same time the colossus of Rhodes is considered history       > not mythology, with lots of statues known from ancient times,       > but clearly many (most?) of the depictions are impossible.       >       > Check out the image on this Wiki page:       >       > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colossus_of_Rhodes       >       > No question here: THAT is myth and not history!       >       > A statue? A really big statue? Sure. Why not. But clearly NOT       > that statue or anything like it....       >       > There seems very little dividing our "History" from myth.       >              Oh, a single example proves your point, the classic, "The exception must       prove the rule"-type reasoning. Have you posted anything on the Wiki       talk page?? (No, you haven't, have you?)              --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca