XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.atheism, can.politics   
   XPost: alt.alien.research   
   From: f00@0f0.00f   
      
   JTEM wrote:   
   > On 7/31/25 4:45 PM, jojo wrote:   
   >   
   >> some say that fuel such as anti-matter can be used to move at a   
   >> significant percent of c.   
   >>   
   >> i am hoping that we can figure out how to move space instead of   
   >> move through space with new physics.   
   >   
   > One massive problem here is that science explains nature, figures   
   > out how it works. Technology is the application of what science   
   > learned about nature.   
   >   
   > If and I do mean IF it is possible to move space itself, shouldn't   
   > that be occurring in nature?   
      
   dark energy?   
      
      
   > I've argued the same about time travel.   
   >   
   > if physics allows for time travel, and it does, should we not be   
   > searching for examples of naturally occurring "Time Machines,"   
   > such as worm holes?   
   >   
   > Should we not be searching for materials -- even if just rocks   
   > -- that have traveled through time?   
   >   
   > Again, science explains nature. Science is just figuring out   
   > how nature works. So in what is effectively an infinitely large   
   > universe, if [blah-blah] conditions will honestly allow for things   
   > like time travel, or the movement of space itself, should we be   
   > able to work out what those conditions would be & search for them?   
   >   
   > Or search for their results?   
   >   
      
   i dont think time travel like moving into the past is possible.   
   but space moving does happen via dark energy (whatever that is).   
      
   and it has no speed limit of light.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)