XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.conspiracy, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian   
   From: jtem01@gmail.com   
      
   I've said it before and I'll say it again:  Darwin is a myth.   
      
   The real Darwin didn't even "believe" in evolution!   
      
   Oh, I know, you had a different thought driven into your skull   
   so you refuse to entertain any other idea.   
      
   You're such a *Good* dog... Pavlov's Dog...   
      
   The communist world under Stalin and later under Mao BANNED   
   evolution. Yes, you could go to prison for teaching evolution   
   of basing any science on it.   
      
   The Nazis had their "Master Race," very true, but long before   
   that all of the west had it's Eugenics! And, yes, the communist   
   world did see this as proof that "evolution" was a western   
   imperialist plot to enforce some social and economic hierarchy.   
      
   But, that hierarchy. Very bad.   
      
   But, here's the thing:  The communist world would NOT have had   
   much is any problem with Darwin himself! Because, as I said,   
   just in case you weren't paying attention; Darwin did NOT   
   believe in evolution!   
      
   Darwin's one and only "Theory" -- if we can call it that, though   
   technically it was never a "Theory" -- wasn't evolution, it was   
   PANGENESIS!   
      
   Google it, assuming you have computer access...   
      
   Darwin, being a complete fraud, a flatulent racist & moron, didn't   
   entirely come up with this "Pangenesis" idea on his own. In fact,   
   he came up with NOTHING on his own. Like everything else, he had   
   plagiarized his pagenesis from "Lamarkism." And when Stalin banned   
   that oh so imperialistic "Evolution" thing in the communist world,   
   what he replaced it with was lysenkoism.   
      
   NOTE:  Lysenkoism was a cheap copy of Lamarkism, just like Darwin's   
   Pangenesis. So that goddamn idiot Darwin didn't even believe in   
   evolution! No, he was in full agreement with the people who would   
   later BAN evolution...   
      
   It gets worse.   
      
   Darwin's topic wasn't even "Evolution" anyway. He was writing   
   about COMMON DESCENT. Now this COMMON DESCENT was a very old idea,   
   Darwin was introduced to it through his grandfather, who was a   
   notable proponent! But some sources will tell you that COMMON   
   DESCENT stretches back into ancient times. However far back you   
   want to put it doesn't matter. What does matter is that you can   
   place it back well before Darwin AND "Evolution" had always been   
   a part of it.   
      
   THINK:  If a goat and a whale share a common ancestor, as COMMON   
   DESCENT insists, then obviously one or both had to have EVOLVED   
   a great deal since the time of that common ancestor.   
      
   It gets worse.   
      
   Google The Mendelian Laws of Inheritance. These would be named   
   for Gregor Mendel the man who effectively cracked the code of   
   inheritance. He contacted Darwin, this Mendel, AND Darwin was   
   exposed to Mendel's work in the literature of the day. And Darwin   
   was such a goddamn jackass that he dismissed Mendel, or just plain   
   ignored him AND AFTERWARDS came out with his pseudo scientific   
   "Pangenesis" crap!   
      
   Get it?  Darwin was handed the answer, threw it away and came up   
   with idiocy instead....   
      
   It gets worse.   
      
   Darwin appears to have "Lost" the communication sent to him by   
   Mendel. And he seemed to have "Lost" letters sent to him from   
   Wallace, a man he appears to have stolen much from, including   
   "Natural Selection."   
      
   Yes, Darwin "Lost" the evidence against him...   
      
   IT TOOK 20 YEARS FOR THE ENGLISH SPEAKING WORLD TO RECOVER   
   FROM DARWIN!   
      
   By becoming the name & face of naturalism, and throwing away   
   Mendel and his cracking the mystery of inheritance, science lost   
   20 years! It took that long for the English Speaking world to   
   discover the science lost to it by Darwin's idiocy...   
      
   So Darwin wasn't a great man of science. He wasn't. Darwin was   
   the enemy of science! Darwin did enormous DAMAGE to science!   
      
   Seriously, you honestly believe that if it weren't for Darwin   
   nobody would have published any books on the origins of species?   
      
   READ YOUR DARWIN GOSPELS!   
      
   Wallace!  Wallace would have still published!   
      
   And, again, without Darwin becoming the face of naturalism and   
   throwing aside Mendel, Mendel's work would likely gained   
   prominence in the English Speaking world....   
      
   There is literally nothing to gain by maintaining the myth of   
   Darwin. Stop settling. Stop accepting brain manure because some   
   self-appointed ruling class ordered you to.   
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
   --   
   https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)