Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.paranormal    |    The paranormal and unexplained    |    34,291 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 32,613 of 34,291    |
|    JTEM to Kenito Benito    |
|    Re: Darwin was a fraud: You're not a ske    |
|    17 Aug 25 10:00:47    |
      XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.conspiracy, alt.atheism       XPost: alt.religion.christian       From: jtem01@gmail.com              On 8/17/25 6:42 AM, Kenito Benito wrote:              > Darwin didn't use the word evolution, but his writings make it       > clear it is the concept he was promoting.              No. Darwin was writing about common descent, and evolution has always       been a part of common descent but Darwin was far too stupid to       realize this.              No, Darwin did NOT believe in evolution. It doesn't matter what words       he misunderstood & misused, Darwin's one and only theory was Pangenesis       and it was totally in line with those who REJECTED and even OUTLAWED       evolution.              > JTEM can deny this reality,       > but it will remain reality.              When you Googled it, what were your search terms?              Here. Allow me to help you out....              The communist world outlawed evolution and replaced it with       "lysenkoism."              Get it? Evolution was banned, outlawed, by Stalin and later Mao.       In it's place they enforced lysenkoism.              Lysenkoism was approved, evolution was outlawed.              Now lysenkoism was based on (a variation on) lamarckism. By no       coincidence what so ever, Darwin's one and only theory, pangenesis       was based on the exact same thing.              Can you see it now?              APPLY what Darwin believed to the real world and you don't end up       with evolution, you end up with what the people who BANNED evolution       believed.              But it gets worse.              BEFORE Darwin's pangenesis -- his slight variation on lamarckism --       Gregor Mendel figured out inheritance. And, yes, Darwin was       exposed. But Darwin was such a fraud, such a fucking idiot that he       REJECTED Mendel in favor of his pseudo scientific nonsense of       pangenesis!              But it gets worse.              By becoming the name & face of naturalism and rejecting the right       answer -- Mendel's answer -- Darwin literally HURT science. He       didn't advance it one iota, HE HELD BACK SCIENCE! It took another       20 years for the English speaking world to rediscover Mendel's       findings and get on the right track.              So, you're wrong. Religious fundamentalists are fixated on the       literal interpretation of words. Are you a religious fundamentalist?              It sure looks that way!              Because if you moved on from a literal interpretation of Darwin's       words as filtered through time, and ignore how Darwin himself       applied his beliefs, you can fool yourself into thinking that Darwin       believed in evolution.                     But why would you do that apart from some joy in dogmatism?                                                 --       https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca