XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.conspiracy, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian   
   From: jtem01@gmail.com   
      
   On 8/17/25 9:55 AM, Attila wrote:   
   > On Fri, 15 Aug 2025 21:29:34 -0400, JTEM    
   > in alt.atheism with message-id   
   > <107omu0$1etcv$1@dont-email.me> wrote:   
   >   
   >>   
   >> I've said it before and I'll say it again:  Darwin is a myth.   
   >>   
   >> The real Darwin didn't even "believe" in evolution!   
   >>   
   >> Oh, I know, you had a different thought driven into your skull   
   >> so you refuse to entertain any other idea.   
   >>   
   >> You're such a *Good* dog... Pavlov's Dog...   
   >>   
   >> The communist world under Stalin and later under Mao BANNED   
   >> evolution. Yes, you could go to prison for teaching evolution   
   >> of basing any science on it.   
   >>   
   >> The Nazis had their "Master Race," very true, but long before   
   >> that all of the west had it's Eugenics! And, yes, the communist   
   >> world did see this as proof that "evolution" was a western   
   >> imperialist plot to enforce some social and economic hierarchy.   
   >>   
   >> But, that hierarchy. Very bad.   
   >>   
   >> But, here's the thing:  The communist world would NOT have had   
   >> much is any problem with Darwin himself! Because, as I said,   
   >> just in case you weren't paying attention; Darwin did NOT   
   >> believe in evolution!   
   >>   
   >> Darwin's one and only "Theory" -- if we can call it that, though   
   >> technically it was never a "Theory" -- wasn't evolution, it was   
   >> PANGENESIS!   
   >>   
   >> Google it, assuming you have computer access...   
   >>   
   >> Darwin, being a complete fraud, a flatulent racist & moron, didn't   
   >> entirely come up with this "Pangenesis" idea on his own. In fact,   
   >> he came up with NOTHING on his own. Like everything else, he had   
   >> plagiarized his pagenesis from "Lamarkism." And when Stalin banned   
   >> that oh so imperialistic "Evolution" thing in the communist world,   
   >> what he replaced it with was lysenkoism.   
   >>   
   >> NOTE:  Lysenkoism was a cheap copy of Lamarkism, just like Darwin's   
   >> Pangenesis. So that goddamn idiot Darwin didn't even believe in   
   >> evolution! No, he was in full agreement with the people who would   
   >> later BAN evolution...   
   >>   
   >> It gets worse.   
   >>   
   >> Darwin's topic wasn't even "Evolution" anyway. He was writing   
   >> about COMMON DESCENT. Now this COMMON DESCENT was a very old idea,   
   >> Darwin was introduced to it through his grandfather, who was a   
   >> notable proponent! But some sources will tell you that COMMON   
   >> DESCENT stretches back into ancient times. However far back you   
   >> want to put it doesn't matter. What does matter is that you can   
   >> place it back well before Darwin AND "Evolution" had always been   
   >> a part of it.   
   >>   
   >> THINK:  If a goat and a whale share a common ancestor, as COMMON   
   >> DESCENT insists, then obviously one or both had to have EVOLVED   
   >> a great deal since the time of that common ancestor.   
   >>   
   >> It gets worse.   
   >>   
   >> Google The Mendelian Laws of Inheritance. These would be named   
   >> for Gregor Mendel the man who effectively cracked the code of   
   >> inheritance. He contacted Darwin, this Mendel, AND Darwin was   
   >> exposed to Mendel's work in the literature of the day. And Darwin   
   >> was such a goddamn jackass that he dismissed Mendel, or just plain   
   >> ignored him AND AFTERWARDS came out with his pseudo scientific   
   >> "Pangenesis" crap!   
   >>   
   >> Get it?  Darwin was handed the answer, threw it away and came up   
   >> with idiocy instead....   
   >>   
   >> It gets worse.   
   >>   
   >> Darwin appears to have "Lost" the communication sent to him by   
   >> Mendel. And he seemed to have "Lost" letters sent to him from   
   >> Wallace, a man he appears to have stolen much from, including   
   >> "Natural Selection."   
   >>   
   >> Yes, Darwin "Lost" the evidence against him...   
   >>   
   >> IT TOOK 20 YEARS FOR THE ENGLISH SPEAKING WORLD TO RECOVER   
   >>FROM DARWIN!   
   >>   
   >> By becoming the name & face of naturalism, and throwing away   
   >> Mendel and his cracking the mystery of inheritance, science lost   
   >> 20 years! It took that long for the English Speaking world to   
   >> discover the science lost to it by Darwin's idiocy...   
   >>   
   >> So Darwin wasn't a great man of science. He wasn't. Darwin was   
   >> the enemy of science! Darwin did enormous DAMAGE to science!   
   >>   
   >> Seriously, you honestly believe that if it weren't for Darwin   
   >> nobody would have published any books on the origins of species?   
   >>   
   >> READ YOUR DARWIN GOSPELS!   
   >>   
   >> Wallace!  Wallace would have still published!   
   >>   
   >> And, again, without Darwin becoming the face of naturalism and   
   >> throwing aside Mendel, Mendel's work would likely gained   
   >> prominence in the English Speaking world....   
   >>   
   >> There is literally nothing to gain by maintaining the myth of   
   >> Darwin. Stop settling. Stop accepting brain manure because some   
   >> self-appointed ruling class ordered you to.   
   >   
   > Yet evolution is an integral part of a number of sciences.   
      
   Why the "Yet?" The topic isn't evolution, it's Darwin. Darwin is   
   a myth. What you think you know about Darwin is a falsehood.   
      
   > I   
   > will go along with that rather than the occasional idiot who   
   > writes long and useless dialogs trying to prove differently.   
      
   You need to Google the term:  Reading Comprehension.   
      
   Under the circumstances, the results are not promising but   
   you would gain points for the effort.   
      
      
      
      
   --   
   https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)