XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.conspiracy, alt.atheism
XPost: alt.religion.christian
From: jtem01@gmail.com
On 8/17/25 4:07 PM, Attila wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Aug 2025 10:21:16 -0400, JTEM
> in alt.atheism with message-id
> <107sogt$2bbjn$4@dont-email.me> wrote:
>
>> On 8/17/25 9:55 AM, Attila wrote:
>>> On Fri, 15 Aug 2025 21:29:34 -0400, JTEM
>>> in alt.atheism with message-id
>>> <107omu0$1etcv$1@dont-email.me> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I've said it before and I'll say it again: Darwin is a myth.
>>>>
>>>> The real Darwin didn't even "believe" in evolution!
>>>>
>>>> Oh, I know, you had a different thought driven into your skull
>>>> so you refuse to entertain any other idea.
>>>>
>>>> You're such a *Good* dog... Pavlov's Dog...
>>>>
>>>> The communist world under Stalin and later under Mao BANNED
>>>> evolution. Yes, you could go to prison for teaching evolution
>>>> of basing any science on it.
>>>>
>>>> The Nazis had their "Master Race," very true, but long before
>>>> that all of the west had it's Eugenics! And, yes, the communist
>>>> world did see this as proof that "evolution" was a western
>>>> imperialist plot to enforce some social and economic hierarchy.
>>>>
>>>> But, that hierarchy. Very bad.
>>>>
>>>> But, here's the thing: The communist world would NOT have had
>>>> much is any problem with Darwin himself! Because, as I said,
>>>> just in case you weren't paying attention; Darwin did NOT
>>>> believe in evolution!
>>>>
>>>> Darwin's one and only "Theory" -- if we can call it that, though
>>>> technically it was never a "Theory" -- wasn't evolution, it was
>>>> PANGENESIS!
>>>>
>>>> Google it, assuming you have computer access...
>>>>
>>>> Darwin, being a complete fraud, a flatulent racist & moron, didn't
>>>> entirely come up with this "Pangenesis" idea on his own. In fact,
>>>> he came up with NOTHING on his own. Like everything else, he had
>>>> plagiarized his pagenesis from "Lamarkism." And when Stalin banned
>>>> that oh so imperialistic "Evolution" thing in the communist world,
>>>> what he replaced it with was lysenkoism.
>>>>
>>>> NOTE: Lysenkoism was a cheap copy of Lamarkism, just like Darwin's
>>>> Pangenesis. So that goddamn idiot Darwin didn't even believe in
>>>> evolution! No, he was in full agreement with the people who would
>>>> later BAN evolution...
>>>>
>>>> It gets worse.
>>>>
>>>> Darwin's topic wasn't even "Evolution" anyway. He was writing
>>>> about COMMON DESCENT. Now this COMMON DESCENT was a very old idea,
>>>> Darwin was introduced to it through his grandfather, who was a
>>>> notable proponent! But some sources will tell you that COMMON
>>>> DESCENT stretches back into ancient times. However far back you
>>>> want to put it doesn't matter. What does matter is that you can
>>>> place it back well before Darwin AND "Evolution" had always been
>>>> a part of it.
>>>>
>>>> THINK: If a goat and a whale share a common ancestor, as COMMON
>>>> DESCENT insists, then obviously one or both had to have EVOLVED
>>>> a great deal since the time of that common ancestor.
>>>>
>>>> It gets worse.
>>>>
>>>> Google The Mendelian Laws of Inheritance. These would be named
>>>> for Gregor Mendel the man who effectively cracked the code of
>>>> inheritance. He contacted Darwin, this Mendel, AND Darwin was
>>>> exposed to Mendel's work in the literature of the day. And Darwin
>>>> was such a goddamn jackass that he dismissed Mendel, or just plain
>>>> ignored him AND AFTERWARDS came out with his pseudo scientific
>>>> "Pangenesis" crap!
>>>>
>>>> Get it? Darwin was handed the answer, threw it away and came up
>>>> with idiocy instead....
>>>>
>>>> It gets worse.
>>>>
>>>> Darwin appears to have "Lost" the communication sent to him by
>>>> Mendel. And he seemed to have "Lost" letters sent to him from
>>>> Wallace, a man he appears to have stolen much from, including
>>>> "Natural Selection."
>>>>
>>>> Yes, Darwin "Lost" the evidence against him...
>>>>
>>>> IT TOOK 20 YEARS FOR THE ENGLISH SPEAKING WORLD TO RECOVER
>>> >FROM DARWIN!
>>>>
>>>> By becoming the name & face of naturalism, and throwing away
>>>> Mendel and his cracking the mystery of inheritance, science lost
>>>> 20 years! It took that long for the English Speaking world to
>>>> discover the science lost to it by Darwin's idiocy...
>>>>
>>>> So Darwin wasn't a great man of science. He wasn't. Darwin was
>>>> the enemy of science! Darwin did enormous DAMAGE to science!
>>>>
>>>> Seriously, you honestly believe that if it weren't for Darwin
>>>> nobody would have published any books on the origins of species?
>>>>
>>>> READ YOUR DARWIN GOSPELS!
>>>>
>>>> Wallace! Wallace would have still published!
>>>>
>>>> And, again, without Darwin becoming the face of naturalism and
>>>> throwing aside Mendel, Mendel's work would likely gained
>>>> prominence in the English Speaking world....
>>>>
>>>> There is literally nothing to gain by maintaining the myth of
>>>> Darwin. Stop settling. Stop accepting brain manure because some
>>>> self-appointed ruling class ordered you to.
>>>
>>> Yet evolution is an integral part of a number of sciences.
>>
>> Why the "Yet?" The topic isn't evolution, it's Darwin. Darwin is
>> a myth. What you think you know about Darwin is a falsehood.
> Who cares?
You want to know who cares what the topic is? Well. Supposedly you
do. I do else I would never have brought it up.
> He was a methodical biologist
Darwin? Wtf?!?!?
You're trolling. You can't possibly be *This* clueless! You're
trolling.
--
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
