Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.paranormal    |    The paranormal and unexplained    |    34,291 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 32,623 of 34,291    |
|    Dawn Flood to JTEM    |
|    Re: Darwin was a fraud: You're not a ske    |
|    17 Aug 25 18:21:08    |
      XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.conspiracy, alt.atheism       XPost: alt.religion.christian       From: Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com              On 8/17/2025 3:52 PM, JTEM wrote:       > On 8/17/25 4:25 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:       >       >> Have you even read "On the Origin of Species"?       >       > Which version?       >       > But, speaking of "Have you ever read," if you ever read what you're       > supposedly replying to, what specifically do you want to dispute,       > and why?       >       >> As for Gregor Mendel, Darwin never read the manuscript       >       > An except was published in a book which Darwin own and did read,       > and left notes in the margins (though not on the except from       > Mendel but it proves he read the book) and Mendel did send him       > a copy which Darwin conveniently "Lost," along with letters from       > Wallace that didn't make him look too good. All of this happened       > BEFORE he came out with this arguably retarded "Pangenesis."       >       > Yes Darwin was handed the answer FIRST, and then came up with       > his pseudo scientific idiocy of pangenesis.       >       > Later I can explain this all again, and you can fail to comprehend       > a word of it, again.       >       >       >              Yep, there were 5 editions of the Origin; everyone knows that. Read the       1st. I am not sure what your point is about Mendel?? He was, of       course, a Augustinian friar and Roman Catholic priest who published his       seminal paper in a minor research journal, and for whatever reason,       Father Mendel did not publicize his results all that much. As I recall,       this one paper was his only significant scientific paper; eventually, he       abandoned his research entirely due to a tornado or other       weather-related disaster at his monastery; plus, he a got a religious       promotion, and he focused his energies afterwards on that.              And, so, yes, Mendel sent Darwin a copy of his research paper, which he       sent to a number of other naturalists of his day, but as I told you, few       were able to read Mendel's work and understand it due to its statistical       nature; as such, it got passed over for nearly a generation, only to be       "rediscovered" at the end of the 19th-century.              Of course, Darwin's focus on evolutionary change at the beginning was       the mechanism of natural selection (Origin, 1st edition), but over time,       Darwin himself drifted away from that paradigm into the paradigm of       Lamarckism (Origin, 5th edition.) Of course, August Weismann put an       abrupt end to Lamarckism with his famous experiments of cutting of the       tails of rats.              Dawn              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca