XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.conspiracy, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian   
   From: jtem01@gmail.com   
      
   On 8/17/25 8:19 PM, Attila wrote:   
   > On Sun, 17 Aug 2025 16:47:41 -0400, JTEM    
   > in alt.atheism with message-id   
   > <107tf5d$2im6m$2@dont-email.me> wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 8/17/25 4:07 PM, Attila wrote:   
   >>> On Sun, 17 Aug 2025 10:21:16 -0400, JTEM    
   >>> in alt.atheism with message-id   
   >>> <107sogt$2bbjn$4@dont-email.me> wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 8/17/25 9:55 AM, Attila wrote:   
   >>>>> On Fri, 15 Aug 2025 21:29:34 -0400, JTEM    
   >>>>> in alt.atheism with message-id   
   >>>>> <107omu0$1etcv$1@dont-email.me> wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> I've said it before and I'll say it again:  Darwin is a myth.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> The real Darwin didn't even "believe" in evolution!   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Oh, I know, you had a different thought driven into your skull   
   >>>>>> so you refuse to entertain any other idea.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> You're such a *Good* dog... Pavlov's Dog...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> The communist world under Stalin and later under Mao BANNED   
   >>>>>> evolution. Yes, you could go to prison for teaching evolution   
   >>>>>> of basing any science on it.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> The Nazis had their "Master Race," very true, but long before   
   >>>>>> that all of the west had it's Eugenics! And, yes, the communist   
   >>>>>> world did see this as proof that "evolution" was a western   
   >>>>>> imperialist plot to enforce some social and economic hierarchy.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> But, that hierarchy. Very bad.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> But, here's the thing:  The communist world would NOT have had   
   >>>>>> much is any problem with Darwin himself! Because, as I said,   
   >>>>>> just in case you weren't paying attention; Darwin did NOT   
   >>>>>> believe in evolution!   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Darwin's one and only "Theory" -- if we can call it that, though   
   >>>>>> technically it was never a "Theory" -- wasn't evolution, it was   
   >>>>>> PANGENESIS!   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Google it, assuming you have computer access...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Darwin, being a complete fraud, a flatulent racist & moron, didn't   
   >>>>>> entirely come up with this "Pangenesis" idea on his own. In fact,   
   >>>>>> he came up with NOTHING on his own. Like everything else, he had   
   >>>>>> plagiarized his pagenesis from "Lamarkism." And when Stalin banned   
   >>>>>> that oh so imperialistic "Evolution" thing in the communist world,   
   >>>>>> what he replaced it with was lysenkoism.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> NOTE:  Lysenkoism was a cheap copy of Lamarkism, just like Darwin's   
   >>>>>> Pangenesis. So that goddamn idiot Darwin didn't even believe in   
   >>>>>> evolution! No, he was in full agreement with the people who would   
   >>>>>> later BAN evolution...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> It gets worse.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Darwin's topic wasn't even "Evolution" anyway. He was writing   
   >>>>>> about COMMON DESCENT. Now this COMMON DESCENT was a very old idea,   
   >>>>>> Darwin was introduced to it through his grandfather, who was a   
   >>>>>> notable proponent! But some sources will tell you that COMMON   
   >>>>>> DESCENT stretches back into ancient times. However far back you   
   >>>>>> want to put it doesn't matter. What does matter is that you can   
   >>>>>> place it back well before Darwin AND "Evolution" had always been   
   >>>>>> a part of it.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> THINK:  If a goat and a whale share a common ancestor, as COMMON   
   >>>>>> DESCENT insists, then obviously one or both had to have EVOLVED   
   >>>>>> a great deal since the time of that common ancestor.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> It gets worse.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Google The Mendelian Laws of Inheritance. These would be named   
   >>>>>> for Gregor Mendel the man who effectively cracked the code of   
   >>>>>> inheritance. He contacted Darwin, this Mendel, AND Darwin was   
   >>>>>> exposed to Mendel's work in the literature of the day. And Darwin   
   >>>>>> was such a goddamn jackass that he dismissed Mendel, or just plain   
   >>>>>> ignored him AND AFTERWARDS came out with his pseudo scientific   
   >>>>>> "Pangenesis" crap!   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Get it?  Darwin was handed the answer, threw it away and came up   
   >>>>>> with idiocy instead....   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> It gets worse.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Darwin appears to have "Lost" the communication sent to him by   
   >>>>>> Mendel. And he seemed to have "Lost" letters sent to him from   
   >>>>>> Wallace, a man he appears to have stolen much from, including   
   >>>>>> "Natural Selection."   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Yes, Darwin "Lost" the evidence against him...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> IT TOOK 20 YEARS FOR THE ENGLISH SPEAKING WORLD TO RECOVER   
   >>>>> >FROM DARWIN!   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> By becoming the name & face of naturalism, and throwing away   
   >>>>>> Mendel and his cracking the mystery of inheritance, science lost   
   >>>>>> 20 years! It took that long for the English Speaking world to   
   >>>>>> discover the science lost to it by Darwin's idiocy...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> So Darwin wasn't a great man of science. He wasn't. Darwin was   
   >>>>>> the enemy of science! Darwin did enormous DAMAGE to science!   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Seriously, you honestly believe that if it weren't for Darwin   
   >>>>>> nobody would have published any books on the origins of species?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> READ YOUR DARWIN GOSPELS!   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Wallace!  Wallace would have still published!   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> And, again, without Darwin becoming the face of naturalism and   
   >>>>>> throwing aside Mendel, Mendel's work would likely gained   
   >>>>>> prominence in the English Speaking world....   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> There is literally nothing to gain by maintaining the myth of   
   >>>>>> Darwin. Stop settling. Stop accepting brain manure because some   
   >>>>>> self-appointed ruling class ordered you to.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Yet evolution is an integral part of a number of sciences.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Why the "Yet?" The topic isn't evolution, it's Darwin. Darwin is   
   >>>> a myth. What you think you know about Darwin is a falsehood.   
   >>   
   >>> Who cares?   
   >>   
   >> You want to know who cares what the topic is? Well. Supposedly you   
   >> do. I do else I would never have brought it up.   
   >   
   > I suppose you think that somehow throwing rocks at Darwin   
      
   You misspelled "Facts."   
      
   If you honestly consider the raising of facts to be no different than   
   throwing rocks at people, you're religious. You're dogmatic.   
      
   I'm glad I offended your religious beliefs.   
      
      
      
   --   
   https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)