XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.conspiracy, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian   
   From: jtem01@gmail.com   
      
   On 8/18/25 12:17 AM, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:   
   > On 17/8/2025 10:14 pm, JTEM wrote:   
   >>   
   >> Did they talk about his methods, like how he didn't test any of his   
   >> ideas? No, the man argued "Logic," or what seemed logical to him.   
   >>   
   >> Did they talk about Darwin's real subject, which was common descent?   
   >>   
   >> Darwin didn't come up with that either. No, he was defending his   
   >> grandfather's work, a strong proponent of common descent.   
   >> ....   
   >> Without Darwin, more deserving men like Wallace & Mendel would   
   >> have risen to prominence and science would have gained 20 years   
   >> over our present timeline.   
   >   
   > Go find an university professor to aid your study about   
      
   Why?  What specifically do you want to pretend is wrong here?   
      
   Do you just FEEL you way through life, reacting emotionally, or   
   do you ever identify specific points of contention, and identify   
   reasons for your "Disagreeing" with them?   
      
   Darwin didn't believe in evolution. I could dine at the Harvard   
   Faculty Club for the next month and nothing is going to change   
   this fact. They'd have to play some childish definitions game in   
   order to shoehorn a scientific Darwin into view....   
      
   "If we define up as down everything is upside down!"   
      
      
      
   --   
   https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)