home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.paranormal      The paranormal and unexplained      34,291 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 32,637 of 34,291   
   Dawn Flood to JTEM   
   Re: Darwin was a fraud: You're not a ske   
   18 Aug 25 19:50:27   
   
   XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.conspiracy, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian   
   From: Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com   
      
   On 8/18/2025 11:47 AM, JTEM wrote:   
   > On 8/17/25 11:42 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:   
   >   
   >> Darwin did not understand Mendel's work   
   >   
   > Darwin would be confused by a Pez dispenser. The man was an idiot.   
   >   
   >> which was true of most naturalists of Darwin's day.   
   >   
   > Not faulting him for that. Except maybe it means he wasn't just   
   > intellectually challenged but a narcissist, believing that if   
   > he couldn't do it no one could.   
   >   
   > HINT:  He could have just ASKED someone!  The man was literally   
   > the name & face of naturalism at the time. He was "Biology   
   > Central" for years! Which is why Mendel reached out to him in   
   > the first place. So Darwin had contacts, and if there was   
   > anything he couldn't grasp -- and there wasn't much he could   
   > grasp -- he could have asked someone.   
   >   
   >> Why is this hard to comprehend?!   
   >   
   > "It's not his fault that he was a moron who didn't believe   
   > in evolution. Why is this hard to comprehend?!"   
   >   
   > It was his fault. He did damage science, not advance it. If his   
   > mother had the good sense to drown him in the tub as a infant   
   > Wallace would have still accomplished his work, Mendel still   
   > would have investigated inheritance and "Evolution" would have   
   > still entered public knowledge.   
   >   
   > Darwin set back science 20 years!   
   >   
   > So even if it would have taken another five or 10 years without   
   > the low life from an aristocratic family, our timeline STILL would   
   > have advanced anywhere from 10 to 15 years AHEAD of where we   
   > presently are!   
   >   
      
   Absolute and utter nonsense.  Darwin's 'On the Origin of Species' is   
   "considered to be the foundation of evolutionary biology."   
      
   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_the_Origin_of_Species   
      
   Outside of the creationists, please find me a SINGLE scholar who agrees   
   with you on your claim that Charles Darwin "was an idiot".  On the   
   following list:   
      
   https://www.discovermagazine.com/the-10-greatest-scientists-of-all-time-919   
      
   Mr. Darwin is listed as #4.   
      
   Dawn   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca