Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.paranormal    |    The paranormal and unexplained    |    34,291 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 32,637 of 34,291    |
|    Dawn Flood to JTEM    |
|    Re: Darwin was a fraud: You're not a ske    |
|    18 Aug 25 19:50:27    |
      XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.conspiracy, alt.atheism       XPost: alt.religion.christian       From: Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com              On 8/18/2025 11:47 AM, JTEM wrote:       > On 8/17/25 11:42 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:       >       >> Darwin did not understand Mendel's work       >       > Darwin would be confused by a Pez dispenser. The man was an idiot.       >       >> which was true of most naturalists of Darwin's day.       >       > Not faulting him for that. Except maybe it means he wasn't just       > intellectually challenged but a narcissist, believing that if       > he couldn't do it no one could.       >       > HINT: He could have just ASKED someone! The man was literally       > the name & face of naturalism at the time. He was "Biology       > Central" for years! Which is why Mendel reached out to him in       > the first place. So Darwin had contacts, and if there was       > anything he couldn't grasp -- and there wasn't much he could       > grasp -- he could have asked someone.       >       >> Why is this hard to comprehend?!       >       > "It's not his fault that he was a moron who didn't believe       > in evolution. Why is this hard to comprehend?!"       >       > It was his fault. He did damage science, not advance it. If his       > mother had the good sense to drown him in the tub as a infant       > Wallace would have still accomplished his work, Mendel still       > would have investigated inheritance and "Evolution" would have       > still entered public knowledge.       >       > Darwin set back science 20 years!       >       > So even if it would have taken another five or 10 years without       > the low life from an aristocratic family, our timeline STILL would       > have advanced anywhere from 10 to 15 years AHEAD of where we       > presently are!       >              Absolute and utter nonsense. Darwin's 'On the Origin of Species' is       "considered to be the foundation of evolutionary biology."              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_the_Origin_of_Species              Outside of the creationists, please find me a SINGLE scholar who agrees       with you on your claim that Charles Darwin "was an idiot". On the       following list:              https://www.discovermagazine.com/the-10-greatest-scientists-of-all-time-919              Mr. Darwin is listed as #4.              Dawn              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca