XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.conspiracy, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian   
   From: jtem01@gmail.com   
      
   On 8/20/25 7:56 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:   
   > On 8/20/2025 11:10 AM, JTEM wrote:   
   >> On 8/20/25 8:34 AM, Dawn Flood wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> I have read the Origin.   
   >>   
   >> No you don't. Remember:  You're pretending to NOT be a religious   
   >> fundamentalist. Instead of INTERPRETING the words of Darwin,   
   >> just look at what he did!   
   >>   
   >> Look at how he  /Applied/  his beliefs.   
   >>   
   >> AFTER Origins was published he gained prominence, he was contact   
   >> by Mendel with his findings, Darwin was exposed to Mendel's work   
   >> in literature that he owned AND THEN he produced the pseudo   
   >> scientific idiocy that is pangenesis.   
   >>   
   >> Pangenesis, as I already pointed out, was nothing more than a   
   >> variation on lamarckism and totally in line with the lysenkoism   
   >> that the communist world produced as a replacement for the   
   >> OUTLAWED "Theory of Evolution."   
   >>   
   >> So, don't read Origins, go read about Lamarckism, pangenesis   
   >> and lysenkoism. Google Stalin and his ban on evolution.   
   >>   
   >> Done.   
   >>   
   >> WHAT DID DARWIN ACTUALLY BELIEVE AND PUT INTO WORDS __AFTER__   
   >> ORIGINS?   
   >>   
   >> Pangenesis.   
   >>   
   >> Is pangenesis "Evolution?"   
   >>   
   >> No.   
   >>   
   >>> The phrase that Darwin used for "evolution" was "descent with   
   >>> modification".   
   >>   
   >> "Transmutation."   
      
   > Just out of pure curiosity   
      
   Are you actually pretending to NOT be a religious fundamentalist?!?!?   
      
   You need someone to tell you what to think?!?!?   
      
   > can you name a single scholar who agrees   
   > with you??   
      
   Can you name a single scholar who DISAGREES with the fact that   
   Darwin's "Theory" was pangenesis, that's Stalin & Mao OUTLAWED   
   evolution and adopted lysenkoism, which was nothing more than   
   a flavor of the same lamarckism that Darwin plagiarized?   
      
   One scholar? Even one?   
      
   You DID Google it, right?   
      
   You wanted to contest what I said so you of course Googled   
   it and you found...   
      
   what?   
      
   Darwin wasn't writing about evolution. He did later adopt the   
   term, when others fed it to him, but he never grasped it and   
   clearly never believed in it.   
      
   Darwin did NOT advance science he damaged it, held it back   
   20 years, just by becoming the name & face of naturalism and   
   marginalizing Mendel...   
      
      
      
      
      
      
   --   
   https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)