XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.conspiracy, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian   
   From: Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com   
      
   On 8/20/2025 7:32 PM, JTEM wrote:   
   >   Dawn Flood wrote:   
   >   
   >> Just out of pure curiosity, can you name a single scholar who agrees   
   >> with you??   
   >   
   > Back in... 2007, was it? Back then, I got into an "Argument"   
   > with talk.origins.   
   >   
   > No, not an argument *In* talk.origins, I got into an   
   > "Argument" WITH talk.origins.   
   >   
   > See, I was arguing that Neanderthals and so called "Moderns"   
   > interbred, and everyone else against the notion.   
   >   
   > I can't honestly state that anyone "Argued" with me, though   
   > I did try.   
   >   
   > The biggest claim they had was the varies media pieces and/or   
   > "Studies" on Neanderthal mtDNA. I pointed out why those   
   > studies were irrelevant, how other accepted science -- accepted   
   > by every last member of that group -- were based on the   
   > OPPOSITE assumptions that the Neanderthal studies were based on...   
   >   
   > Exactly like you right now, nobody was capable of acknowledging   
   > what I was saying, much less address a word of it.   
   >   
   > This is how I know you're either a troll or painfully stupid.   
   >   
   > Either way, you are beyond pathetic. Which explains the sock   
   > puppets.   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   > P.S.  Not too many years later the Neanderthal genome was   
   > mapped and interbreeding was confirmed.   
   >   
   > P.P.S.  Before the sequencing of their genome, a man named   
   > Erik Trunkaus had already proved interbreeding using   
   > anatomy...   
   >   
      
   If you didn't publish such in a peer-reviewed scientific journal (or at   
   least submit a preprint), no one cares.  Sorry.   
      
   Dawn   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)