XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.conspiracy, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian   
   From: f00@0f0.00f   
      
   Kenito Benito wrote:   
   > On Fri, 22 Aug 2025 16:21:58 +0000, jojo wrote:   
   >   
   >> Dawn Flood wrote:   
   >>> On 8/18/2025 10:42 PM, JTEM wrote:   
   >>>> On 8/18/25 8:44 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On 8/18/2025 12:37 PM, JTEM wrote:   
   >>>>>> I know this. And Darwin AND YOU group with these people,   
   >>>>>> believing   
   >>>>>> what you always heard and never challenging or testing.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> No way! Here was the prevailing view prior to Darwin:   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Darwin's grandfather was probably the biggest proponent of   
   >>>> common descent in his day. Darwin was simply regurgitating   
   >>>> what he was raised with.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Darwin never looked forward, as an idiot who simply accepted   
   >>>> what was told, he always looked backwards. This is how he   
   >>>> could believe in such idiocy as his pangenesis. He plagiarized   
   >>>> lamarck! That's all. And even Lamarck was hardly a trail   
   >>>> blazer himself! It was all well tred ground...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> This is exactly like you: Not educated but trained like one   
   >>>> of Pavlov's Dogs! The absolute easiest thing in the world   
   >>>> would be to look at a myth such as Darwin and saying, "Yeah.   
   >>>> What we are taught about Darwin is a myth. The jackass didn't   
   >>>> even believe in evolution!"   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Well it would be easy if you didn't merely accept what was   
   >>>> handed to you....   
   >>>   
   >>> Darwin's original idea was evolution by natural selection, an   
   >>> idea that he developed over the course of a few decades. Alfred   
   >>> Russel Wallace discovered the similar idea over the course of a   
   >>> few hours, wrote it up and sent his manuscript across the World   
   >>> (Wallace was in southeast Asia at the time) to Darwin! It was   
   >>> Darwin's friends, Charles Lyell and Joseph Hooker, who arranged   
   >>> for both Darwin and Wallace's papers to be published   
   >>> simultaneously with a reading at the Linnean Society.   
   >>   
   >> did wallace do any field work? if not, no credits for him.   
   >   
   > He did.   
   > If you wish to learn more about Wallace, you can read the   
   > following at your leisure:   
   >   
   > https://evolution.berkeley.edu/the-history-of-evolutionary-tho   
   ght/1800s/natural-selection-charles-darwin-alfred-russel-wallace/   
   >   
   > https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/alfred-wallace/   
   >   
   > There are many more site you can read, if you wish, of course.   
   > These are just two of many that detail his part in the theory of   
   > evolution.   
   >   
      
   thanks, it will be at my leisure.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|