XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.conspiracy, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian   
   From: f00@0f0.00f   
      
   JTEM wrote:   
   > On 8/25/25 1:45 AM, jojo wrote:   
   >   
   >> i would define a person of science as anyone who defers to the   
   >> scientific method   
   >   
   > Which certainly wasn't Darwin.   
   >   
   > Didn't you pretend to have read Darwin? WHAT excuse for a "Test," an   
   > "Experiment" did you imagine he performed in an attempt to falsify   
   > the bullshit he was spewing?   
   >   
   > Then man argued "Logic" and I put it in quote because it was far   
   > from   
   > logical. It was what passed for logical in his mind.   
   >   
   > He wasn't a scientist. He failed the basics.   
   >   
   > Plus he just didn't believe in evolution. Yes he did eventually use   
   > the term, BUT THAT JUST MAKES IT WORSE!  I mean,   
   > misusing/misunderstanding the word "Evolution" makes him a BIGGER   
   > IDIOT, not less of one...   
   >   
   > If you're faith based, clinging to mythology out of faith -- the   
   > Darwin myth -- you are religious.   
   >   
      
   i never said i read darwin, are you talking about someone else?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)