Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.paranormal    |    The paranormal and unexplained    |    34,291 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 32,733 of 34,291    |
|    JTEM to All    |
|    Paleo anthropology is NOT a real science    |
|    25 Aug 25 22:42:15    |
      XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy       XPost: alt.religion.christian       From: jtem01@gmail.com              The truth is, if there isn't an obvious commercial       or national security application, there is no such       thing as science. It's all politics...                            Now there are thousands of men & women sporting every       conceivable academic credential & boasting of decades       of experience, all willing to stand in line to tell       me that I’m wrong, that I’m an idiot, that I don’t       know what I’m talking about. But the truth is that       Paleoanthropology is not a real science, and if you       have any idea what real science is you’re going to       agree with me.              Let me prove it to you.              To illustrate the biggest issue I’ll start with an       old joke which I will now repeat here quite poorly…              So it’s late at night and a man is walking down the       street when he comes across this gentleman under a       street lamp, on all fours & frantically searching       for something.              “What’s the problem?” the first man asks, more       curious than concerned.              “Well,” explains the second man,“ I was standing       over there,” he says while pointing to a dark corner       on the other side of the street, “when I dropped my       house key. I’m going to need it to get inside my       home.”              “But if you dropped it way over there, why are you       searching for it here?” the first man asked.              Gesturing towards the street light above, “The light       over here is better,” he explains.              Of course you can see the stupidity in searching for       something where the light is better, instead of       where you lost it. It doesn’t matter how good the       light is, or how much help you get, if something       isn’t there you’re never going to find it. You       understand this. This makes sense to you. This,       however, is diametrically opposed to the workings       of Paleoanthropology.              It’s all about the ice age.              For most of human evolution, and certainly this is       true for the last 3 million years or so, the ice       age was the engine of change. The glaciers rose,       sea levels dropped – opening up vast treks of new       land. But, not just land, these were highways for       our prehuman ancestors to travel, to spread out       of Africa, across to the Arabian peninsular and       beyond into Asia, Europe and even Australia.       Mainstream paleoanthropology accepts this,       preaches this even, and yet they throw it aside       and base all their conclusions on a model where       this doesn’t exist at all.              See, if the coast was the highway which spread       our pre modern ancestors across the world while       keeping us genetically linked (a single species),       then our ancestors were living on the coast. They       didn’t have dune buggies. They weren’t just       driving along the beach for some hours each day,       and then pulling off at a nearby Savanna to hunt       & gather. They were living off the ocean. They       were adapting to the aquatic environment. But,       regardless, these coastal populations, these       spreaders of humanity, this conduit of human DNA       is what made us human. As evolution produced new       genes in, say, Africa or even Asia, it was       through these coastal populations that they       arrived elsewhere, keeping us one.              Nobody cares about these populations.              Paleoanthropology doesn’t even acknowledge that they       would have to exist. It’s dependent upon them 100%,       sure. It requires there existence to get our       ancestors out of Africa in the first place, it even       posits numerous waves leaving Africa(*), but then       paleoanthropology immediately turns around and       pretends they don’t exist.              Nobody has ever even looked for them. Again, it’s       all about the ice age.              Now the ice age isn’t what most people think it is.       They think that an ice age is when Europe and north       America are under a sheet of ice, and when they are       not under a sheet of ice the ice age is over. WRONG!              An ice age isn’t one long stretch of frozen glaciers.       Nope. It’s actually a cycle. The glaciers grow,       spread and then retreat again as a warming period,       called an “interglacial period,” takes over. This       warming period comes to an end and the whole cycle       repeats itself… again & again. We are inside an       interglacial period now. That’s right, we are still       in an ice age. It hasn’t ended ended. What did end       was the last glacial period. There is another one       set to begin within the next few thousand years.              During the height of the ice age – glacial maximum       – the sea levels were much lower. Sea level was more       than 100 meters lower than it is today! For       Americans: We’re talking almost 400 feet! That’s       how much sea level dropped. And what this means is       that the coastal routes traveled by our pre human       ancestors, the environments they lived in, adapted       to, the physical remains of those populations       responsible for making us human are presently below       some 100 meters or more of water.              Nobody is looking for them.              This brings me back to my joke, the one about the       man searching for his key NOT where he lost it,       but where the light is better. Paleoanthropologists       don’t look for our ancestors where they most likely       lived. They don’t look for our ancestors where their       very own models say they need to be.       Paleoanthropologists look for our ancestors where       it’s convenient for them to look, and they base all       of their decisions on those finds. This is a       selection bias. None of their conclusions meet       decent scientific standards, all are based on       cherry picked and likely unrepresentative data and       they all know it. And swear it isn’t true.                     This was from a 2012 thread of mine, elsewhere on       the Interwebs (not usenet)                                                 --       https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca