XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian   
   From: jtem01@gmail.com   
      
   On 8/27/25 8:54 PM, vjp2.at@at.BioStrategist.dot.dot.com wrote:   
   > Well, carbon dating depends on a logarithmic scale, and the farther back in   
   > time you go, the greater the errors. THere is nothing to compare the results   
   > to to be sure. Maybe you can carbin date something back a few thousand years   
   > to be sure, but not further back.   
      
   If you know about science, if you understand the very basics of   
   science, the scientific method, then the underlying problem I   
   laid out was a bias: A sample/selection/preservation bias! AND   
   THEN there's the circular reasoning where everything is interpreted   
   within the context of their pre existing conclusion.   
      
   FIRST comes the conclusion AND THEN comes the evidence which   
   miraculously becomes interpreted within the context of the   
   conclusion...   
      
      
      
      
      
   --   
   https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)