XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.conspiracy, alt.atheism
XPost: alt.religion.christian
From: Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com
On 8/27/2025 11:44 PM, JTEM wrote:
> On 8/27/25 4:32 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:
>
>> I haven't
>
> You haven't a clue.
>
> Google: Pangenesis lysenkoism lamarckism
>
> To show you how intentionally this Darwin fraud is, THIS is from
> the Google A.I.'s comparison of pangenesis & lamarckism...
>
>
> Darwin's theory of Pangenesis and Lamarckism both proposed
> the inheritance of acquired characteristics as a mechanism
> of evolution, with Lamarckism stating that traits developed
> during an organism's lifetime were passed on, while
> Pangenesis suggested the body produced "gemmules" that
> collected in the gonads to be inherited.
>
>
> HINT: BOTH state that traits acquired during an organisms
> lifetime are passed on!
>
> BOTH!
>
> "Gemmules" are the means for passing these traits on!
>
> THEY ARE THE SAME THING! Darwin just names his "Gemmules"
> as the way traits are passed. That's all.
>
> Now Google A.I.'s comparison of lysenkoism and lamarckism...
>
> Lamarckism is an outdated evolutionary theory that claimed an
> organism can pass on characteristics acquired during its lifetime
> to its offspring.
>
>
> It goes on to describe lysenkoism as pseudo scientific -- as if
> lamarckism or pangenesis isn't -- and also calls it political. If
> this is true then it's still one better than Darwin as he came
> to it by way of sheer stupidity...
>
> Darwin has ZERO incentive to go the pseudo scientific route. He
> was just too stupid to know there was a difference!
>
Okay, Darwin got some things wrong? And, your point is??
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
