XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.conspiracy, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian   
   From: Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com   
      
   On 8/29/2025 5:06 PM, JTEM wrote:   
   > On 8/29/25 10:05 AM, Dawn Flood wrote:   
   >   
   >> If Charles Darwin did not believe in "evolution", why did his name   
   >> appear 74 times   
   >   
   > You are so outstandingly STUPID that I'm at a loss. I feel that I   
   > want to insult you but have no hope of matching, much less   
   > exceeding, the insult that nature has so clearly dealt you...   
   >   
   > IF you want to pretend to be able to grasp words that lay before   
   > you then address what I stated. I gave you a chain to follow --   
   > all of three links in length -- which brought you to the fact that   
   > Darwin is a myth, that the real Darwin never even believed in   
   > evolution. And instead of evaluating the facts presented, instead   
   > of dealing with the facts you habitually vomit fallacious   
   > "Arguments" the likes of which would get you dismissed from any   
   > high school level debating team... "I want authorities to tell me   
   > what things mean," and "if what you say is true, why isn't it more   
   > popular?"   
   >   
   > Pangenesis. Lysenkoism. Lamarckism.   
   >   
   > Shades of gray separate them, AT BEST. Each is just a slight   
   > rephrasing of the next. AND, it is exactly what Darwin believed   
   > and EXACTLY what the people who banned "evolution" believed.   
   >   
   > Pretend you're normal and address this fact.   
   >   
      
   Well, why did the Scopes Trial even happen then?  What was the big   
   deal??  Why did BOTH sides even mention Darwin?  And, why no mention of   
   the fact that Darwin did *not* "believe" in evolution??   
      
   Dawn   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)