XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian   
   From: Kenito@Benito.naw   
      
   On Sat, 30 Aug 2025 01:48:04 +0000, Mitchell Holman    
   wrote:   
      
   >JTEM  wrote in news:108t7p9$28t4m$1@dont-email.me:   
   >   
   >> On 8/29/25 11:55 AM, Attila wrote:   
   >>> On Thu, 28 Aug 2025 00:56:32 -0400, JTEM    
   >>> in alt.atheism with message-id   
   >>> <108oni1$13oqk$2@dont-email.me> wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 8/27/25 8:54 PM, vjp2.at@at.BioStrategist.dot.dot.com wrote:   
   >>>>> Well, carbon dating depends on a logarithmic scale, and the farther   
   >>>>> back in time you go, the greater the errors. THere is nothing to   
   >>>>> compare the results to to be sure. Maybe you can carbin date   
   >>>>> something back a few thousand years to be sure, but not further   
   >>>>> back.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> If you know about science, if you understand the very basics of   
   >>>> science, the scientific method, then the underlying problem I   
   >>>> laid out was a bias: A sample/selection/preservation bias! AND   
   >>>> THEN there's the circular reasoning where everything is interpreted   
   >>>> within the context of their pre existing conclusion.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> FIRST comes the conclusion AND THEN comes the evidence which   
   >>>> miraculously becomes interpreted within the context of the   
   >>>> conclusion...   
   >>   
   >>> That is totally wrong but you will never admit this.   
   >>   
   >> Admit... what?  That they dig were it's convenient to dig, where they   
   >> believe they can find fossils?   
   >>   
   >> Of course they do.   
   >>   
   >> All fossil hunters do this. But in the example of dinosaurs it's not   
   >> as critical as it is with HUMAN evolution, because the dinosaur   
   >> hunters are finding dinosaurs!  The idiots faking it and calling it   
   >> science usually have no way what so ever to tell WHAT is a human   
   >> ancestor and what isn't, but they pretend that they can and do....   
   >>   
   >> You can redeem yourself, somewhat, by identifying precisely what   
   >> you're pretending is wrong, and explaining WHY.   
   >   
   >   
   >    You can redeem YOURSELF by posting your   
   >proven alternative to evolution.   
      
        JTEM has nothing but his religious belief. Having a religious   
   belief, as JTEM proves he does, isn't instantly a bad thing. And it's   
   actually normal to have a religious belief. But this doesn't make the   
   belief true.   
      
   --   
   Kenito Benito   
   Strategic Writer,   
   Psychotronic World Dominator.   
   And FEMA camp counselor.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)