XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.politics.democrats, sci.skeptic   
   From: f00@0f0.00f   
      
   JTEM wrote:   
   > On 8/30/25 5:34 PM, jojo wrote:   
   >   
   >> it is a very slow moving train   
   >   
   > No. It is literally impossible to be true. The Gwobull Warbling   
   > narrative is false. It's incapable of being true.   
   >   
   > When did it start? Do you even know what the narrative claims   
   > was the start?   
   >   
   > What were CO2 emissions at the time?   
   >   
   > HINT:  We'd have to kill off most of humanity, like 7 out of   
   > every 8 people alive, just to bring the CO2 expelled by   
   > human breathing down BELOW the level your narrative says it   
   > took to spark Gwobull Warbling in the first place.   
   >   
   > Google it:  When it started. The planet's population. How   
   > much CO2 humanity produces (by exhaling). The difference   
   > between how much CO2 is exhaled at current population levels   
   > as compared to the population levels when the narrative   
   > pretends that Gwobull Warbling began.   
   >   
   > It's difficult to work out.   
   >   
   > What I'm saying is that, according to your own precious   
   > Greta Gospels (How dare you! How dare you!), there is   
   > literally no way what so ever to stop Gwobull Warbling or   
   > even slow it down... especially when you consider that   
   > NASA claims that CO2 will remain in the atmosphere for as   
   > long as a thousand years!   
   >   
   > How long has it been since the Industrial Revolution?   
   >   
   > Hmm?   
   >   
   > The Gwobull Warbling narrative succeeds due to ignorance.   
   > People are lazy, they accept what they are told to believe   
   > and they have zero interest in testing claims.   
   >   
   > The CO2 fairy tale is NOT internally consistent, it does   
   > NOT hold up under scrutiny.   
   >   
   > It's false.   
   >   
   > And never has one single "Solution" enacted ever mapped   
   > to any reduction in CO2, much less a reversal of trends...   
   >   
      
   well heating for the next 100 years at least is locked in,   
   because most of it has been absorbed by the oceans. its like   
   boiling water, takes a while but when you stop the heat, it   
   doesnt go back to room temperature instantly.   
      
   regarding the solutions, i think anything short of stopping   
   civilization like those extinction people say is something that   
   can be done.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)