XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.politics.democrats, sci.skeptic   
   From: f00@0f0.00f   
      
   JTEM wrote:   
   > On 8/31/25 1:17 PM, jojo wrote:   
   >> JTEM wrote:   
   >>> On 8/30/25 5:34 PM, jojo wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> it is a very slow moving train   
   >>>   
   >>> No. It is literally impossible to be true. The Gwobull Warbling   
   >>> narrative is false. It's incapable of being true.   
   >>>   
   >>> When did it start? Do you even know what the narrative claims   
   >>> was the start?   
   >>>   
   >>> What were CO2 emissions at the time?   
   >>>   
   >>> HINT:  We'd have to kill off most of humanity, like 7 out of   
   >>> every 8 people alive, just to bring the CO2 expelled by   
   >>> human breathing down BELOW the level your narrative says it   
   >>> took to spark Gwobull Warbling in the first place.   
   >>>   
   >>> Google it:  When it started. The planet's population. How   
   >>> much CO2 humanity produces (by exhaling). The difference   
   >>> between how much CO2 is exhaled at current population levels   
   >>> as compared to the population levels when the narrative   
   >>> pretends that Gwobull Warbling began.   
   >>>   
   >>> It's difficult to work out.   
   >>>   
   >>> What I'm saying is that, according to your own precious   
   >>> Greta Gospels (How dare you! How dare you!), there is   
   >>> literally no way what so ever to stop Gwobull Warbling or   
   >>> even slow it down... especially when you consider that   
   >>> NASA claims that CO2 will remain in the atmosphere for as   
   >>> long as a thousand years!   
   >>>   
   >>> How long has it been since the Industrial Revolution?   
   >>>   
   >>> Hmm?   
   >>>   
   >>> The Gwobull Warbling narrative succeeds due to ignorance.   
   >>> People are lazy, they accept what they are told to believe   
   >>> and they have zero interest in testing claims.   
   >>>   
   >>> The CO2 fairy tale is NOT internally consistent, it does   
   >>> NOT hold up under scrutiny.   
   >>>   
   >>> It's false.   
   >>>   
   >>> And never has one single "Solution" enacted ever mapped   
   >>> to any reduction in CO2, much less a reversal of trends...   
   >   
   >> well heating for the next 100 years at least is locked in   
   >   
   > What you're saying is that THINGS THAT NEVER HAPPENED, a prediction   
   > from the same people who never got a prediction right PROVES   
   > Gwobull Warbling, while actual observations do not.   
   >   
      
   i think climate alarmists are wrong in the short term. people who   
   have lived longer than me have said they have noticed local changes.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)