Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.paranormal    |    The paranormal and unexplained    |    34,291 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 32,845 of 34,291    |
|    Andrew to Mitchell Holman    |
|    Re: Paleo anthropology is NOT a real sci    |
|    02 Sep 25 03:33:04    |
      XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy       XPost: alt.religion.christian       From: andrew.321.remov@usa.net              "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message news:XnsB34DD311C106F629555@69.80.102.13...       > "Andrew" wrote:       >> "Dawn Flood" wrote:       >>       >>> PRIOR TO DARWIN, THE DOMINANT VIEW AMONG SCHOLARS WAS CREATIONISM!!!       >>>       >>> Get it now?! Yes, Darwin got some things wrong! Here's Darwin's BIG       >>> contribution:       >>>       >>> NATURALISM REPLACED SUPERNATURALISM AS THE EXPLANATION FOR LIFE!       >>>       >>> Do you need me to make things clearer for you??       >>>       >>> Dawn       >>       >> Thanks Dawn, but you see, Without a       >> Creation there would be no naturalism.       >>       >> Furthermore, conviction often came to him       >> (Darwin) that he was devoting his life to a       >> phantasy.       >>       >> He said that often a "cold shudder" would       >> run trough his body testifying to that fact.       >>       >> "Often and often a cold shudder has run       >> through me, and I have asked myself       >> whether I may not have devoted my life       >> to a phantasy."       >> ~Darwin       >       > And now, the rest of the quote:       >       > "I rejoice profoundly that you intend       > admitting doctrine of modification in       > your new Edition. Nothing, I am convinced,       > could be more important for its success.       > I honour you most sincerely:-to have       > maintained, in the position of a master,       > one side of a question for 30 years &       > then deliberately give it up, is a fact,       > to which I much doubt whether the records       > of science offer a parallel. For myself,       > also, I rejoice profoundly; for thinking       > of the many cases of men pursuing an       > illusion for years, often & often a cold       > shudder has run through me & I have asked       > myself whether I may not have devoted my       > life to a phantasy. Now I look at it as       > morally impossible that investigators of       > truth like you & Hooker can be wholly       > wrong; & therefore I feel that I may rest       > in peace."       >       > Here we have another instance of a very       > telling sentence being omitted from a       > quote, Darwin stating that he did not       > feel that he had been devoting himself       > to a phantasy.              Although "often and often" Dawwin's mortal frame       rippled with the awful thoughtb that his whole life was       devoted, not to the truth, but rather to only a *phantasy*       his troubled conscience is ~partially assuaged~ on the       grounds that Lyell & Hooker who also believed in the       ~same phantasy~ that he did, "could not be wholly       wrong".              So since they could not possibly be "wholly wrong"       (Darwin says) he feels that he may "rest in peace".              Of course the question for those of us who want the        truth now is, "Was it, or, was it not, a phantasy?"              To the unbiased student the answer is..              Most emphatically it was!              "The essence of Darwinism lies in a single phrase: natural        selection is the creative force of evolutionary change. No        one denies that selection will play a negative role in        eliminating the unfit. Darwinian theories require that it        create the fit as well".               ~ S.J. Gould              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca