XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian   
   From: Kenito@Benito.naw   
      
   On Tue, 2 Sep 2025 03:33:47 -0700, "Andrew"    
   wrote:   
      
   >"Dawn Flood wrote in message news:10957ul$5kqd$1@dont-email.me...   
   >> Andrew wrote:   
   >>> "Dawn Flood" wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> PRIOR TO DARWIN, THE DOMINANT VIEW AMONG SCHOLARS WAS CREATIONISM!!!   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Get it now?! Yes, Darwin got some things wrong! Here's Darwin's BIG   
   >>>> contribution:   
   >>>>   
   >>>> NATURALISM REPLACED SUPERNATURALISM AS THE EXPLANATION FOR LIFE!   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Do you need me to make things clearer for you??   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Dawn   
   >>>   
   >>> Thanks Dawn, but you see, Without a Creation there would be no naturalism.   
   >>>   
   >>> Furthermore, conviction often came to him (Darwin) that he was devoting   
   >>> his life to a phantasy. He said that often a "cold shudder" would run   
   trough   
   >>> his body testifying to that fact.   
   >>>   
   >>> "Often and often a cold shudder has run through me, and I have asked   
   >>>      myself whether I may not have devoted my life to a phantasy."   
   >>>                                                  ~Darwin   
   >> Andrew,   
   >>   
   >> Don't start!  Okay??   
   >   
   >Why do folks like you get nervous like this?  Because you   
   >have been exposed to truth that exposes your position to be   
   >indefensible. And that you stand on a platform that is false.   
   >   
      
        Dawn is a creationist? I'm surprised.   
      
   >> Dawn   
   >>   
   >> P.S.  If you want to explore Creationism (again!), then   
   >> start another thread in a.a.   
   >   
   >It is _YOUR_ above that I am responding to!   
   >   
   >I saw you were talking about naturalism and creationism.   
   >I'm simply pointing out to you the simple fact that, with-   
   >out a creation there could not possibly be any 'naturalism'.   
   >   
      
        Everything exists. How it got to this point is the question.   
        You believe a god is behind it. And being intellectually honest,   
   I can't say it's false outright. There is no way to prove or disprove   
   the existence of a god.   
        Evolution, as used here, is also not something we can prove or   
   disprove. We can't live long enough. We can, and do, offer evidence   
   that supports it, however.   
      
   >Unless you understood that, then you would forever be   
   >fighting against the TRUTH  And to fight "against the   
   >truth" always ends in futility; and exposes oneself to   
   >be a fool.   
   >   
   >So don't start! Okay??   
      
        You've already proved yourself the fool.   
      
   --   
   Kenito Benito   
   Strategic Writer,   
   Psychotronic World Dominator.   
   And FEMA camp counselor.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)