XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian   
   From: andrew.321.remov@usa.net   
      
   "Kenito Benito" wrote in message news:60gibkdbr2hipne0ai0nt75s7v   
   8t1vmk2@4ax.com...   
   > "Andrew" wrote:   
   >>"Kenito Benito" wrote:   
   >>> "Andrew" wrote:   
   >>>>"Dawn Flood:   
   >>>>> Andrew wrote:   
   >>>>>> "Dawn Flood" wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> PRIOR TO DARWIN, THE DOMINANT VIEW AMONG SCHOLARS WAS CREATIONISM!!!   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Get it now?! Yes, Darwin got some things wrong! Here's Darwin's BIG   
   contribution:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> NATURALISM REPLACED SUPERNATURALISM AS THE EXPLANATION FOR LIFE!   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Do you need me to make things clearer for you??   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Dawn   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Thanks Dawn, but you see, Without a Creation there would be no   
   naturalism.   
   >>   
   >>Unrefuted fact, again pointing to Creation.   
   >>   
   >>>>>> Furthermore, conviction often came to him (Darwin) that he was devoting   
   >>>>>> his life to a phantasy. He said that often a "cold shudder" would run   
   trough   
   >>>>>> his body testifying to that fact.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> "Often and often a cold shudder has run through me, and I have asked   
   >>>>>>      myself whether I may not have devoted my life to a phantasy."   
   >>>>>>                                                  ~Darwin   
   >>>>> Andrew,   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Don't start!  Okay??   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Why do folks like you get nervous like this?  Because you   
   >>>>have been exposed to truth that exposes your position to be   
   >>>>indefensible. And that you stand on a platform that is false.   
   >>>   
   >>>     Dawn is a creationist? I'm surprised.   
   >>   
   >>No.   
   >>   
   >   
   >     But above you claim Dawn's position is indefensible.   
      
   Yes.   
      
   > As such, you are making the claim she is.   
      
   Her position is.   
      
   >> >>> P.S.  If you want to explore Creationism (again!), then   
   >>>>> start another thread in a.a.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>It is _YOUR_ above that I am responding to!   
   >>>>   
   >>>>I saw you were talking about naturalism and creationism.   
   >>>>I'm simply pointing out to you the simple fact that, with-   
   >>>>out a creation there could not possibly be any 'naturalism'.   
   >>>   
   >>>     Everything exists. How it got to this point is the question.   
   >>   
   >>Where did it start? Do you ever connsider that?   
   >   
   >     The "Big Bang" is where everything started.   
      
   You apparently believe that. That the origin of all   
   things is explained by the fantasized explosion of   
   a primordial cosmic egg that came from nothing.   
      
   Although blatantly contrary to the laws of science,   
   nevertheless you believe~ by faith. Yet you still   
   fail to understand how foolish your position is.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)