XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian   
   From: f00@0f0.00f   
      
   JTEM wrote:   
   > On 9/5/25 9:13 AM, Dawn Flood wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 9/4/2025 2:10 PM, JTEM wrote:   
   >   
   >>> Paleo anthropology is not a real science. It doesn't adhere to   
   >>> scientific methods. Period.   
   >>>   
   >>> That's all you need to know.   
   >>>   
   >>> Abiogenesis isn't science.   
   >>>   
   >>> SETI isn't science.   
   >>>   
   >>> Your lack of understanding can't change anything.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> Are you a scientist?   
   >   
   > Hey, cunt!  Wait. I can call you cunt, right? We're all friends   
   > here,   
   > aren't we? I feel like we're friends and friends routinely give each   
   > other nick names. So, mind if I call you cunt?   
   >   
   > It rhymes with your intellect:  Runt!   
   >   
   > Anyway, cunt, although I have already pointed this out, spelled this   
   > out a ridiculous number of times you keep returning to the exact   
   > same   
   > fallacies so, I'll point it out again. And you will, very cunt like,   
   > fail to grasp a word of it...   
   >   
   > So. What answer to your question can alter the facts I spelled out?   
   >   
   > SETI hasn't been falsified in the DECADES of claimed failure.   
   >   
   > Did you not notice this? It escaped you? You can't figure these   
   > things   
   > out and no high priest bestowed this truth unto you?   
   >   
   > A HYPOTHESIS is only a hypothesis if it can be falsified.   
   > Experiments   
   > are tests, and a if failed test cant falsify a hypothesis then it's   
   > not a hypothesis. IT'S NOT SCIENCE!   
   >   
   > SETI can't be falsified. Abiogenesis can't be falsified. Paleo   
   > anthropology has been thoroughly falsified time and time again and   
   > it refuses to alter course.   
   >   
   >> Scientists have PhDs   
   >   
   > Scientists adhere to scientific methods. Regardless of their   
   > education. They can have 19 Phds and if they do not rigidly   
   > adhere to scientific methods then they are never a scientist.   
   >   
   > You're religious. You insist upon high priests.   
   >   
   >> which means that they have defended a dissertation   
   >   
   > So you're pretending that SETI is science, despite not being   
   > falsifiable, because someone you can't name defended a dissertation   
   > that you never read and couldn't understand anyway...   
   >   
   > That's so cute, cunt!   
   >   
   >   
      
   you dont need to use fowl language.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)