XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian   
   From: jtem01@gmail.com   
      
   On 9/10/25 11:22 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:   
      
   > On 9/10/2025 5:07 PM, JTEM wrote:   
   >> You don't grasp that science is a process, an approach   
   >> and not a piece of paper someone hands you.   
   >>   
   >> You aren't even aware that there's a difference between   
   >> evidence and proof, and that science deals in evidence.   
      
   > We have to agree to disagree   
      
   This isn't a point of disagreement. You lack understanding.   
      
   MATH deals in proofs, science does not.   
      
   > 3)  Peer-reviewed research   
      
   "Peer review" doesn't even exist in many cases. They use A.I.   
   and all of it's flaws. Regardless, the debate BEGINS with   
   publication. You can't grasp this, believing that publication   
   ends debate.   
      
   A paper gets published AND THEN the debate begins!   
      
   There are countless examples of garbage papers meeting the   
   standards of "Peer review." Unfortunately there is no way   
   to guess at the number of solid works denied using the   
   excuse of "Peer review." I am aware of one, a letter written   
   by a researcher into the Oral Vaccine Theory on the origins   
   of AIDS in Africa, but my learning about that was more or   
   less a fluke. When a good paper is killed using "Peer   
   review" then, as a rule, it vanishes. Only the stinking   
   garbage that passed muster and was published can be counted.   
      
      
      
   --   
   https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)