XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.atheism, alt.religion.christian
From: Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com
On 9/12/2025 7:45 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
> None wrote in news:10a081v$366mu$1@dont-email.me:
>
>> On Sep 11, 2025, Mitchell Holman wrote
>> (Message-ID: ):
>>
>>> None wrote in news:109vbc8$2tbin$1@dont-email.me:
>>>
>>>> On Sep 11, 2025, Mitchell Holman wrote
>>>> (Message-ID: ):
>>>>
>>>>> "Andrew" wrote in
>>>>> news:rKAwQ.12261$7F4e.8283@fx05.ams4:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Dawn Flood" wrote in message
>>>>>> news:109tfa4$29gbi$1@dont-email.me...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To sum-up, paleoanthropology is a valid science, because,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1) Major universities exist which offer doctoral degrees in
>>>>>>> paleoanthropology.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2) The US National Academy of Sciences has admitted
>>>>>>> paleoanthropologists to its ranks.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 3) Peer-reviewed research journals exist for
>>>>>>> paleoanthropology.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 4) Few, if any, scientists dispute the fact that
>>>>>>> paleoanthropology is a valid science.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In spite of all that you say above, it is noted that
>>>>>> you are at a complete loss of words when I ask
>>>>>> you to tell us about any specific paleo-anthropological
>>>>>> discovery that shows that they have enlightened
>>>>>> us about ~anything~...in your own words.
>>>>>
>>>>> And you are a "complete loss of words"
>>>>> to tell us the age of the earth, or even
>>>>> us your opinion of it.
>>>>
>>>> The earth as you know it was not until it was called earth on the
>>>> 3rd day of this realm. The planets stars, etc were not until the
>>>> 4th day of this realm. All this occurred around 6,000 years ago. In
>>>> literal time, not figurative nor theoretical.
>>>
>>> Why 6,000?
>>>
>>> How do you determine that date?
>>
>> What date? I mentioned time approximate.
>
>
>
> OK, "time approximate"
>
> Why 6000 years?
>
> What happened then?
>
>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And are their so called ""discoveries"" built upon
>>>>>> scientific method, or are they built upon fantasy?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Those who want the truth do not accept stories that
>>>>>> are built upon fantasy.
>>>>>
>>>>> Modern Christian: Someone who believes
>>>>> in dragons, unicorns, talking snakes and
>>>>> transmutation (all mentioned in the Bible)
>>>>> but accuses those citing scientific data
>>>>> of "indulging in fantasies".
>>>>
>>>> Then I do not fit your daffynition.
>>>>
>>>> Scientific data only recounts what is reversed engineered, and from
>>>> that understanding, some try to create variations based on the same
>>>> things that always existed in the time of man, reshape, and reuse,
>>>> and most generally it all contaminates the earth and its
>>>> environment.
>>>
>>> What other data is there to
>>> measure time but scientific data?
>>> The universe expands at a known
>>> rate, the continents move at a
>>> known rate, starlight reaches our
>>> eyes at a known rate. If those
>>> known rates are wrong what rates
>>> are right?
>>
>> If the continents moved at a known rate then there would be no
>> earthquakes. All volcanos would erupt and known cycles and explosive
>> rates.
>>
>> If such massive errors are made then what credibility does the rest of
>> your statement have.
>>
>> Science has recently recognized another light form, one that was
>> spoken of near 5,000 years ago + or - and they have yet to determine
>> its parameters.
>
>
> Where was this "spoken of" 5000 years ago?
>
>
Oh, the memories of my fundamentalist Christian childhood! Of course,
my childhood occurred back in the 1980s, which, someday, may become
known as the end of the "Information Dark Ages".
Dawn
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
