XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.atheism, alt.religion.christian   
   From: f00@0f0.00f   
      
   None wrote:   
   > On Sep 12, 2025, Dawn Flood wrote   
   > (Message-ID: <10a1e6t$3jm3q$2@dont-email.me>):   
   >   
   >> On 9/12/2025 7:45 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:   
   >>> None   wrote in news:10a081v$366mu$1@dont-email.me:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On Sep 11, 2025, Mitchell Holman wrote   
   >>>> (Message-ID: ):   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> None   wrote in news:109vbc8$2tbin$1@dont-email.me:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On Sep 11, 2025, Mitchell Holman wrote   
   >>>>>> (Message-ID: ):   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> "Andrew"  wrote in   
   >>>>>>> news:rKAwQ.12261$7F4e.8283@fx05.ams4:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> "Dawn Flood" wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>> news:109tfa4$29gbi$1@dont-email.me...   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> To sum-up, paleoanthropology is a valid science, because,   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> 1) Major universities exist which offer doctoral degrees in   
   >>>>>>>>> paleoanthropology.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> 2) The US National Academy of Sciences has admitted   
   >>>>>>>>> paleoanthropologists to its ranks.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> 3) Peer-reviewed research journals exist for   
   >>>>>>>>> paleoanthropology.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> 4) Few, if any, scientists dispute the fact that   
   >>>>>>>>> paleoanthropology is a valid science.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> In spite of all that you say above, it is noted that   
   >>>>>>>> you are at a complete loss of words when I ask   
   >>>>>>>> you to tell us about any specific paleo-anthropological   
   >>>>>>>> discovery that shows that they have enlightened   
   >>>>>>>> us about ~anything~...in your own words.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> And you are a "complete loss of words"   
   >>>>>>> to tell us the age of the earth, or even   
   >>>>>>> us your opinion of it.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> The earth as you know it was not until it was called earth on the   
   >>>>>> 3rd day of this realm. The planets stars, etc were not until the   
   >>>>>> 4th day of this realm. All this occurred around 6,000 years ago. In   
   >>>>>> literal time, not figurative nor theoretical.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Why 6,000?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> How do you determine that date?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> What date? I mentioned time approximate.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> OK, "time approximate"   
   >>>   
   >>> Why 6000 years?   
   >>>   
   >>> What happened then?   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> And are their so called ""discoveries"" built upon   
   >>>>>>>> scientific method, or are they built upon fantasy?   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Those who want the truth do not accept stories that   
   >>>>>>>> are built upon fantasy.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Modern Christian: Someone who believes   
   >>>>>>> in dragons, unicorns, talking snakes and   
   >>>>>>> transmutation (all mentioned in the Bible)   
   >>>>>>> but accuses those citing scientific data   
   >>>>>>> of "indulging in fantasies".   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Then I do not fit your daffynition.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Scientific data only recounts what is reversed engineered, and from   
   >>>>>> that understanding, some try to create variations based on the same   
   >>>>>> things that always existed in the time of man, reshape, and reuse,   
   >>>>>> and most generally it all contaminates the earth and its   
   >>>>>> environment.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> What other data is there to   
   >>>>> measure time but scientific data?   
   >>>>> The universe expands at a known   
   >>>>> rate, the continents move at a   
   >>>>> known rate, starlight reaches our   
   >>>>> eyes at a known rate. If those   
   >>>>> known rates are wrong what rates   
   >>>>> are right?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> If the continents moved at a known rate then there would be no   
   >>>> earthquakes. All volcanos would erupt and known cycles and explosive   
   >>>> rates.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> If such massive errors are made then what credibility does the rest of   
   >>>> your statement have.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Science has recently recognized another light form, one that was   
   >>>> spoken of near 5,000 years ago + or - and they have yet to determine   
   >>>> its parameters.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Where was this "spoken of" 5000 years ago?   
   >>   
   >> Oh, the memories of my fundamentalist Christian childhood! Of course,   
   >> my childhood occurred back in the 1980s, which, someday, may become   
   >> known as the end of the "Information Dark Ages".   
   >>   
   >> Dawn   
   >   
   > Or more likely the beginning of the end of this age.   
   >   
      
   you mean zombie jesus?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)