XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.atheism, alt.religion.christian
From: f00@0f0.00f
None wrote:
> On Sep 12, 2025, jojo wrote
> (Message-ID:<06a0238b-feb9-9555-dd59-2b9bffd6e3a0@shinku.aoyagi.konjou>):
>
>> Dawn Flood wrote:
>>> On 9/12/2025 11:43 AM, jojo wrote:
>>>> None wrote:
>>>>> On Sep 12, 2025, Dawn Flood wrote
>>>>> (Message-ID: <10a1e6t$3jm3q$2@dont-email.me>):
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 9/12/2025 7:45 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>>> None wrote in
>>>>>>> news:10a081v$366mu$1@dont-email.me:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sep 11, 2025, Mitchell Holman wrote
>>>>>>>> (Message-ID: ):
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> None wrote in
>>>>>>>>> news:109vbc8$2tbin$1@dont-email.me:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 11, 2025, Mitchell Holman wrote
>>>>>>>>>> (Message-ID: ):
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "Andrew" wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>> news:rKAwQ.12261$7F4e.8283@fx05.ams4:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Dawn Flood" wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>> news:109tfa4$29gbi$1@dont-email.me...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> To sum-up, paleoanthropology is a valid science, because,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Major universities exist which offer doctoral
>>>>>>>>>>>>> degrees in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> paleoanthropology.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) The US National Academy of Sciences has admitted
>>>>>>>>>>>>> paleoanthropologists to its ranks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) Peer-reviewed research journals exist for
>>>>>>>>>>>>> paleoanthropology.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4) Few, if any, scientists dispute the fact that
>>>>>>>>>>>>> paleoanthropology is a valid science.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> In spite of all that you say above, it is noted that
>>>>>>>>>>>> you are at a complete loss of words when I ask
>>>>>>>>>>>> you to tell us about any specific paleo-anthropological
>>>>>>>>>>>> discovery that shows that they have enlightened
>>>>>>>>>>>> us about ~anything~...in your own words.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> And you are a "complete loss of words"
>>>>>>>>>>> to tell us the age of the earth, or even
>>>>>>>>>>> us your opinion of it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The earth as you know it was not until it was called
>>>>>>>>>> earth on the
>>>>>>>>>> 3rd day of this realm. The planets stars, etc were not
>>>>>>>>>> until the
>>>>>>>>>> 4th day of this realm. All this occurred around 6,000
>>>>>>>>>> years ago. In
>>>>>>>>>> literal time, not figurative nor theoretical.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Why 6,000?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> How do you determine that date?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What date? I mentioned time approximate.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> OK, "time approximate"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why 6000 years?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What happened then?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> And are their so called ""discoveries"" built upon
>>>>>>>>>>>> scientific method, or are they built upon fantasy?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Those who want the truth do not accept stories that
>>>>>>>>>>>> are built upon fantasy.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Modern Christian: Someone who believes
>>>>>>>>>>> in dragons, unicorns, talking snakes and
>>>>>>>>>>> transmutation (all mentioned in the Bible)
>>>>>>>>>>> but accuses those citing scientific data
>>>>>>>>>>> of "indulging in fantasies".
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Then I do not fit your daffynition.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Scientific data only recounts what is reversed
>>>>>>>>>> engineered, and from
>>>>>>>>>> that understanding, some try to create variations based
>>>>>>>>>> on the same
>>>>>>>>>> things that always existed in the time of man, reshape,
>>>>>>>>>> and reuse,
>>>>>>>>>> and most generally it all contaminates the earth and its
>>>>>>>>>> environment.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What other data is there to
>>>>>>>>> measure time but scientific data?
>>>>>>>>> The universe expands at a known
>>>>>>>>> rate, the continents move at a
>>>>>>>>> known rate, starlight reaches our
>>>>>>>>> eyes at a known rate. If those
>>>>>>>>> known rates are wrong what rates
>>>>>>>>> are right?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If the continents moved at a known rate then there would be no
>>>>>>>> earthquakes. All volcanos would erupt and known cycles and
>>>>>>>> explosive
>>>>>>>> rates.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If such massive errors are made then what credibility does
>>>>>>>> the rest of
>>>>>>>> your statement have.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Science has recently recognized another light form, one
>>>>>>>> that was
>>>>>>>> spoken of near 5,000 years ago + or - and they have yet to
>>>>>>>> determine
>>>>>>>> its parameters.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Where was this "spoken of" 5000 years ago?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oh, the memories of my fundamentalist Christian childhood! Of
>>>>>> course,
>>>>>> my childhood occurred back in the 1980s, which, someday, may
>>>>>> become
>>>>>> known as the end of the "Information Dark Ages".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dawn
>>>>>
>>>>> Or more likely the beginning of the end of this age.
>>>>
>>>> you mean zombie jesus?
>>>
>>> LOL!
>>>
>>> Yeah, Jesus' "imminent return" has been predicted for quite some
>>> time now!
>>>
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predictions_and_claims_for_the_Second_Coming
>>>
>>>
>>> Given the Second Law of Thermodynamics and the fact that Jesus'
>>> remains are in a highly advanced state of decomposition, I think
>>> that his "return" is quite unlikely!!
>>>
>>> Dawn
>>
>> during the cricifiction, the trauma turned jesus into deadpool,
>> that is the most logical conclusion, he is an x-man.. x-person.
>
> Which the event was prophesied of around 1,000 years before that.
> Through Daniel, Isaiah, King David and others in the OT, but not your
> conclusion and mockery.
>
lol btw have you seen the movies? i highly recommend!
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
