XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.atheism, alt.religion.christian   
   From: Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com   
      
   On 9/13/2025 12:26 PM, None wrote:   
   > On Sep 13, 2025, Mitchell Holman wrote   
   > (Message-ID: ):   
   >   
   >> Mitchell Holman  wrote in news:XnsB358CF3E8E274629555@   
   >> 69.80.101.15:   
   >>   
   >>> Mitchell Holman  wrote in news:XnsB3584D7933A7629555@   
   >>> 69.80.101.18:   
   >>>   
   >>>> None   wrote in news:10a081v$366mu$1@dont-email.me:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On Sep 11, 2025, Mitchell Holman wrote   
   >>>>> (Message-ID: ):   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> None   wrote in news:109vbc8$2tbin$1@dont-email.me:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> On Sep 11, 2025, Mitchell Holman wrote   
   >>>>>>> (Message-ID: ):   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> "Andrew"  wrote in   
   >>>>>>>> news:rKAwQ.12261$7F4e.8283@fx05.ams4:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> "Dawn Flood" wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>>> news:109tfa4$29gbi$1@dont-email.me...   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> To sum-up, paleoanthropology is a valid science, because,   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> 1) Major universities exist which offer doctoral degrees in   
   >>>>>>>>>> paleoanthropology.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> 2) The US National Academy of Sciences has admitted   
   >>>>>>>>>> paleoanthropologists to its ranks.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> 3) Peer-reviewed research journals exist for   
   >>>>>>>>>> paleoanthropology.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> 4) Few, if any, scientists dispute the fact that   
   >>>>>>>>>> paleoanthropology is a valid science.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> In spite of all that you say above, it is noted that   
   >>>>>>>>> you are at a complete loss of words when I ask   
   >>>>>>>>> you to tell us about any specific paleo-anthropological   
   >>>>>>>>> discovery that shows that they have enlightened   
   >>>>>>>>> us about ~anything~...in your own words.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> And you are a "complete loss of words"   
   >>>>>>>> to tell us the age of the earth, or even   
   >>>>>>>> us your opinion of it.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> The earth as you know it was not until it was called earth on the   
   >>>>>>> 3rd day of this realm. The planets stars, etc were not until the   
   >>>>>>> 4th day of this realm. All this occurred around 6,000 years ago.   
   >> In   
   >>>>>>> literal time, not figurative nor theoretical.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Why 6,000?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> How do you determine that date?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> What date? I mentioned time approximate.   
   >>   
   >> OK, "time approximate"   
   >>   
   >> Why 6000 years?   
   >>   
   >> What happened then?   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> And are their so called ""discoveries"" built upon   
   >>>>>>>>> scientific method, or are they built upon fantasy?   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Those who want the truth do not accept stories that   
   >>>>>>>>> are built upon fantasy.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Modern Christian: Someone who believes   
   >>>>>>>> in dragons, unicorns, talking snakes and   
   >>>>>>>> transmutation (all mentioned in the Bible)   
   >>>>>>>> but accuses those citing scientific data   
   >>>>>>>> of "indulging in fantasies".   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Then I do not fit your daffynition.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Scientific data only recounts what is reversed engineered, and   
   >> from   
   >>>>>>> that understanding, some try to create variations based on the   
   >> same   
   >>>>>>> things that always existed in the time of man, reshape, and reuse,   
   >>>>>>> and most generally it all contaminates the earth and its   
   >>>>>>> environment.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> What other data is there to   
   >>>>>> measure time but scientific data?   
   >>>>>> The universe expands at a known   
   >>>>>> rate, the continents move at a   
   >>>>>> known rate, starlight reaches our   
   >>>>>> eyes at a known rate. If those   
   >>>>>> known rates are wrong what rates   
   >>>>>> are right?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> If the continents moved at a known rate then there would be no   
   >>>>> earthquakes. All volcanos would erupt and known cycles and explosive   
   >>>>> rates.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> If such massive errors are made then what credibility does the rest   
   >> of   
   >>>>> your statement have.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Science has recently recognized another light form, one that was   
   >>>>> spoken of near 5,000 years ago + or - and they have yet to determine   
   >>>>> its parameters.   
   >>   
   >> Where was this "spoken of" 5000 years ago?   
   >   
   > Historically both answers are written in the Bible.   
   >   
      
   Please do not waste too much of your time on this stuff.  Life is far   
   too short!   
      
   Dawn   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)