XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.atheism, alt.religion.christian   
   From: Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com   
      
   On 9/12/2025 11:34 PM, jojo wrote:   
   > None wrote:   
   >> On Sep 12, 2025, jojo wrote   
   >> (Message-ID:<7eda1708-e6d3-9729-9571-07b6d26f6447@shinku.aoyagi.konjou>):   
   >>   
   >>> None wrote:   
   >>>> On Sep 12, 2025, jojo wrote   
   >>>> (Message-ID:<06a0238b-feb9-9555-   
   >>>> dd59-2b9bffd6e3a0@shinku.aoyagi.konjou>):   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> Dawn Flood wrote:   
   >>>>>> On 9/12/2025 11:43 AM, jojo wrote:   
   >>>>>>> None wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> On Sep 12, 2025, Dawn Flood wrote   
   >>>>>>>> (Message-ID: <10a1e6t$3jm3q$2@dont-email.me>):   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> On 9/12/2025 7:45 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> None   wrote in   
   >>>>>>>>>> news:10a081v$366mu$1@dont-email.me:   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 11, 2025, Mitchell Holman wrote   
   >>>>>>>>>>> (Message-ID: ):   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> None   wrote in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> news:109vbc8$2tbin$1@dont-email.me:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 11, 2025, Mitchell Holman wrote   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> (Message-ID: ):   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Andrew"  wrote in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:rKAwQ.12261$7F4e.8283@fx05.ams4:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Dawn Flood" wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:109tfa4$29gbi$1@dont-email.me...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To sum-up, paleoanthropology is a valid science, because,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Major universities exist which offer doctoral   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> degrees in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paleoanthropology.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) The US National Academy of Sciences has admitted   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paleoanthropologists to its ranks.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) Peer-reviewed research journals exist for   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paleoanthropology.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4) Few, if any, scientists dispute the fact that   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paleoanthropology is a valid science.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In spite of all that you say above, it is noted that   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you are at a complete loss of words when I ask   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you to tell us about any specific paleo-anthropological   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> discovery that shows that they have enlightened   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us about ~anything~...in your own words.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And you are a "complete loss of words"   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to tell us the age of the earth, or even   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> us your opinion of it.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> The earth as you know it was not until it was called   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> earth on the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> 3rd day of this realm. The planets stars, etc were not   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> until the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> 4th day of this realm. All this occurred around 6,000   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> years ago. In   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> literal time, not figurative nor theoretical.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Why 6,000?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> How do you determine that date?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> What date? I mentioned time approximate.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> OK, "time approximate"   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Why 6000 years?   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> What happened then?   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And are their so called ""discoveries"" built upon   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scientific method, or are they built upon fantasy?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Those who want the truth do not accept stories that   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are built upon fantasy.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Modern Christian: Someone who believes   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in dragons, unicorns, talking snakes and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> transmutation (all mentioned in the Bible)   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> but accuses those citing scientific data   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of "indulging in fantasies".   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Then I do not fit your daffynition.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Scientific data only recounts what is reversed   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> engineered, and from   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> that understanding, some try to create variations based   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> on the same   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> things that always existed in the time of man, reshape,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> and reuse,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> and most generally it all contaminates the earth and its   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> environment.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> What other data is there to   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> measure time but scientific data?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> The universe expands at a known   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> rate, the continents move at a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> known rate, starlight reaches our   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> eyes at a known rate. If those   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> known rates are wrong what rates   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> are right?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> If the continents moved at a known rate then there would be no   
   >>>>>>>>>>> earthquakes. All volcanos would erupt and known cycles and   
   >>>>>>>>>>> explosive   
   >>>>>>>>>>> rates.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> If such massive errors are made then what credibility does   
   >>>>>>>>>>> the rest of   
   >>>>>>>>>>> your statement have.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Science has recently recognized another light form, one   
   >>>>>>>>>>> that was   
   >>>>>>>>>>> spoken of near 5,000 years ago + or - and they have yet to   
   >>>>>>>>>>> determine   
   >>>>>>>>>>> its parameters.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Where was this "spoken of" 5000 years ago?   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Oh, the memories of my fundamentalist Christian childhood! Of   
   >>>>>>>>> course,   
   >>>>>>>>> my childhood occurred back in the 1980s, which, someday, may   
   >>>>>>>>> become   
   >>>>>>>>> known as the end of the "Information Dark Ages".   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Dawn   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Or more likely the beginning of the end of this age.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> you mean zombie jesus?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> LOL!   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Yeah, Jesus' "imminent return" has been predicted for quite some   
   >>>>>> time now!   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/   
   >>>>>> Predictions_and_claims_for_the_Second_Coming   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Given the Second Law of Thermodynamics and the fact that Jesus'   
   >>>>>> remains are in a highly advanced state of decomposition, I think   
   >>>>>> that his "return" is quite unlikely!!   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Dawn   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> during the cricifiction, the trauma turned jesus into deadpool,   
   >>>>> that is the most logical conclusion, he is an x-man.. x-person.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Which the event was prophesied of around 1,000 years before that.   
   >>>> Through Daniel, Isaiah, King David and others in the OT, but not your   
   >>>> conclusion and mockery.   
   >>>   
   >>> lol btw have you seen the movies? i highly recommend!   
   >>   
   >> Nope.   
   >>   
   >   
   > oh damn you are missing out!! here, i will point them out:   
   >   
   > deadpool - 2016   
   > deadpool 2 - 2018   
   >   
   > if you want, i can send you the torrent links.   
   >   
      
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)