XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.atheism, alt.religion.christian
From: f00@0f0.00f
None wrote:
> On Sep 12, 2025, jojo wrote
> (Message-ID:<40b4253c-cfab-c94e-400d-e6a5e4ed4743@shinku.aoyagi.konjou>):
>
>> None wrote:
>>> On Sep 12, 2025, jojo wrote
>>> (Message-ID:<7eda1708-e6d3-9729-9571-07b6d26f6447@shinku.aoyagi.konjou>):
>>>
>>>> None wrote:
>>>>> On Sep 12, 2025, jojo wrote
>>>>> (Message-ID:<06a0238b-feb9-9555-dd59-2b9bffd6e3a0@shinku.aoyagi.konjou>):
>>>>>
>>>>>> Dawn Flood wrote:
>>>>>>> On 9/12/2025 11:43 AM, jojo wrote:
>>>>>>>> None wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Sep 12, 2025, Dawn Flood wrote
>>>>>>>>> (Message-ID: <10a1e6t$3jm3q$2@dont-email.me>):
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 9/12/2025 7:45 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> None wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>> news:10a081v$366mu$1@dont-email.me:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 11, 2025, Mitchell Holman wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>> (Message-ID: ):
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> None wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:109vbc8$2tbin$1@dont-email.me:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 11, 2025, Mitchell Holman wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Message-ID: ):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Andrew" wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:rKAwQ.12261$7F4e.8283@fx05.ams4:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Dawn Flood" wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:109tfa4$29gbi$1@dont-email.me...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To sum-up, paleoanthropology is a valid science, because,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Major universities exist which offer doctoral
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> degrees in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paleoanthropology.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) The US National Academy of Sciences has admitted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paleoanthropologists to its ranks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) Peer-reviewed research journals exist for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paleoanthropology.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4) Few, if any, scientists dispute the fact that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paleoanthropology is a valid science.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In spite of all that you say above, it is noted that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you are at a complete loss of words when I ask
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you to tell us about any specific paleo-anthropological
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> discovery that shows that they have enlightened
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us about ~anything~...in your own words.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And you are a "complete loss of words"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to tell us the age of the earth, or even
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us your opinion of it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The earth as you know it was not until it was called
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> earth on the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3rd day of this realm. The planets stars, etc were not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> until the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4th day of this realm. All this occurred around 6,000
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> years ago. In
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> literal time, not figurative nor theoretical.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why 6,000?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do you determine that date?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> What date? I mentioned time approximate.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> OK, "time approximate"
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Why 6000 years?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> What happened then?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And are their so called ""discoveries"" built upon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scientific method, or are they built upon fantasy?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Those who want the truth do not accept stories that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are built upon fantasy.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Modern Christian: Someone who believes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in dragons, unicorns, talking snakes and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> transmutation (all mentioned in the Bible)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but accuses those citing scientific data
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of "indulging in fantasies".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then I do not fit your daffynition.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scientific data only recounts what is reversed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> engineered, and from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that understanding, some try to create variations based
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on the same
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things that always existed in the time of man, reshape,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and reuse,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and most generally it all contaminates the earth and its
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> environment.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> What other data is there to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> measure time but scientific data?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The universe expands at a known
>>>>>>>>>>>>> rate, the continents move at a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> known rate, starlight reaches our
>>>>>>>>>>>>> eyes at a known rate. If those
>>>>>>>>>>>>> known rates are wrong what rates
>>>>>>>>>>>>> are right?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> If the continents moved at a known rate then there would be no
>>>>>>>>>>>> earthquakes. All volcanos would erupt and known cycles and
>>>>>>>>>>>> explosive
>>>>>>>>>>>> rates.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> If such massive errors are made then what credibility does
>>>>>>>>>>>> the rest of
>>>>>>>>>>>> your statement have.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Science has recently recognized another light form, one
>>>>>>>>>>>> that was
>>>>>>>>>>>> spoken of near 5,000 years ago + or - and they have yet to
>>>>>>>>>>>> determine
>>>>>>>>>>>> its parameters.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Where was this "spoken of" 5000 years ago?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Oh, the memories of my fundamentalist Christian childhood! Of
>>>>>>>>>> course,
>>>>>>>>>> my childhood occurred back in the 1980s, which, someday, may
>>>>>>>>>> become
>>>>>>>>>> known as the end of the "Information Dark Ages".
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Dawn
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Or more likely the beginning of the end of this age.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> you mean zombie jesus?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LOL!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yeah, Jesus' "imminent return" has been predicted for quite some
>>>>>>> time now!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predictions_and_claims_for
the_Second_Comi
>>>>>>> ng
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Given the Second Law of Thermodynamics and the fact that Jesus'
>>>>>>> remains are in a highly advanced state of decomposition, I think
>>>>>>> that his "return" is quite unlikely!!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dawn
>>>>>>
>>>>>> during the cricifiction, the trauma turned jesus into deadpool,
>>>>>> that is the most logical conclusion, he is an x-man.. x-person.
>>>>>
>>>>> Which the event was prophesied of around 1,000 years before that.
>>>>> Through Daniel, Isaiah, King David and others in the OT, but not your
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
