XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.atheism, alt.religion.christian
From: f00@0f0.00f
None wrote:
> On Sep 12, 2025, jojo wrote
> (Message-ID:<66cd3d50-fa5c-b89b-0405-5364b6196bec@shinku.aoyagi.konjou>):
>
>> None wrote:
>>> On Sep 12, 2025, jojo wrote
>>> (Message-ID:<36cb7b5c-2ec7-c228-591c-669629382162@shinku.aoyagi.konjou>):
>>>
>>>> None wrote:
>>>>> On Sep 12, 2025, jojo wrote
>>>>> (Message-ID:<3062ad19-25c3-a45a-e05d-a79020cb5598@shinku.aoyagi.konjou>):
>>>>>
>>>>>> None wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sep 12, 2025, Dawn Flood wrote
>>>>>>> (Message-ID: <10a1e6t$3jm3q$2@dont-email.me>):
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 9/12/2025 7:45 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>>>>> None wrote in news:10a081v$366mu$1@dont-email.me:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 11, 2025, Mitchell Holman wrote
>>>>>>>>>> (Message-ID: ):
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> None wrote in news:109vbc8$2tbin$1@dont-email.me:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 11, 2025, Mitchell Holman wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>> (Message-ID: ):
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Andrew" wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:rKAwQ.12261$7F4e.8283@fx05.ams4:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Dawn Flood" wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:109tfa4$29gbi$1@dont-email.me...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To sum-up, paleoanthropology is a valid science, because,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Major universities exist which offer doctoral degrees in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paleoanthropology.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) The US National Academy of Sciences has admitted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paleoanthropologists to its ranks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) Peer-reviewed research journals exist for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paleoanthropology.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4) Few, if any, scientists dispute the fact that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paleoanthropology is a valid science.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In spite of all that you say above, it is noted that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you are at a complete loss of words when I ask
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you to tell us about any specific paleo-anthropological
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> discovery that shows that they have enlightened
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us about ~anything~...in your own words.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> And you are a "complete loss of words"
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to tell us the age of the earth, or even
>>>>>>>>>>>>> us your opinion of it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The earth as you know it was not until it was called earth on the
>>>>>>>>>>>> 3rd day of this realm. The planets stars, etc were not until the
>>>>>>>>>>>> 4th day of this realm. All this occurred around 6,000 years ago.
In
>>>>>>>>>>>> literal time, not figurative nor theoretical.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Why 6,000?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> How do you determine that date?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What date? I mentioned time approximate.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> OK, "time approximate"
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Why 6000 years?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What happened then?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And are their so called ""discoveries"" built upon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scientific method, or are they built upon fantasy?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Those who want the truth do not accept stories that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are built upon fantasy.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Modern Christian: Someone who believes
>>>>>>>>>>>>> in dragons, unicorns, talking snakes and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> transmutation (all mentioned in the Bible)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> but accuses those citing scientific data
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of "indulging in fantasies".
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Then I do not fit your daffynition.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Scientific data only recounts what is reversed engineered, and
from
>>>>>>>>>>>> that understanding, some try to create variations based on the
same
>>>>>>>>>>>> things that always existed in the time of man, reshape, and reuse,
>>>>>>>>>>>> and most generally it all contaminates the earth and its
>>>>>>>>>>>> environment.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> What other data is there to
>>>>>>>>>>> measure time but scientific data?
>>>>>>>>>>> The universe expands at a known
>>>>>>>>>>> rate, the continents move at a
>>>>>>>>>>> known rate, starlight reaches our
>>>>>>>>>>> eyes at a known rate. If those
>>>>>>>>>>> known rates are wrong what rates
>>>>>>>>>>> are right?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If the continents moved at a known rate then there would be no
>>>>>>>>>> earthquakes. All volcanos would erupt and known cycles and explosive
>>>>>>>>>> rates.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If such massive errors are made then what credibility does the rest
>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>> your statement have.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Science has recently recognized another light form, one that was
>>>>>>>>>> spoken of near 5,000 years ago + or - and they have yet to determine
>>>>>>>>>> its parameters.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Where was this "spoken of" 5000 years ago?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Oh, the memories of my fundamentalist Christian childhood! Of course,
>>>>>>>> my childhood occurred back in the 1980s, which, someday, may become
>>>>>>>> known as the end of the "Information Dark Ages".
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Dawn
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Or more likely the beginning of the end of this age.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> you mean zombie Jesus?
>>>>>
>>>>> Actually it started in the 70’s when reconsidering the events of the
>>>>> day.
>>>>> It was the beginning of the rise of greater evil under the guise of free
>>>>> love. LSD, and other drugs came in like a flood. It was a counter
movement
>>>>> of
>>>>> the Evil one against the rise of the youth turning to Jesus. Some called
>>>>> it
>>>>> the Jesus Movement. IIRC.
>>>>
>>>> soo... like the counter movement age is ending, which started in
>>>> the 70s? ohhh you are referencing the woke is dead stuff??
>>>
>>> Not at all, the ending of this age is the ending of the time period where
>>> the
>>> Lord is focused on the Gentiles and their salvation. The age that started
>>> when Jesus Christ returned to Heaven.
>>>
>>> The time period that Dawn is speaking about is going to greatly increase,
>>> soon. And that increase will last only seven years to the day that it
>>> begins.
>>
>> why only gentiles? i dont get that, even islams?
>
> Yes, the Old covenant was for the Israelites, not the Gentiles, the door was
> not closed to the Gentiles, but they had to believe in the God of the
> Israelites.
>
> The Promise of the Messiah was to Israel. Yet it was mentioned in the OT that
> he was also coming for the Gentiles to redeem them as well, openly.
>
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
