XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.atheism, alt.religion.christian   
   From: Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com   
      
   On 9/13/2025 2:09 PM, jojo wrote:   
   > jojo wrote:   
   >> Dawn Flood wrote:   
   >>> On 9/12/2025 11:34 PM, jojo wrote:   
   >>>> None wrote:   
   >>>>> On Sep 12, 2025, jojo wrote   
   >>>>> (Message-ID:<7eda1708-   
   >>>>> e6d3-9729-9571-07b6d26f6447@shinku.aoyagi.konjou>):   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> None wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On Sep 12, 2025, jojo wrote   
   >>>>>>> (Message-ID:<06a0238b-feb9-9555-   
   >>>>>>> dd59-2b9bffd6e3a0@shinku.aoyagi.konjou>):   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Dawn Flood wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> On 9/12/2025 11:43 AM, jojo wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> None wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 12, 2025, Dawn Flood wrote   
   >>>>>>>>>>> (Message-ID: <10a1e6t$3jm3q$2@dont-email.me>):   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/12/2025 7:45 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> None wrote in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:10a081v$366mu$1@dont-email.me:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 11, 2025, Mitchell Holman wrote   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Message-ID: ):   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> None wrote in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:109vbc8$2tbin$1@dont-email.me:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 11, 2025, Mitchell Holman wrote   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Message-ID: ):   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Andrew" wrote in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:rKAwQ.12261$7F4e.8283@fx05.ams4:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Dawn Flood" wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:109tfa4$29gbi$1@dont-email.me...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To sum-up, paleoanthropology is a valid science,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Major universities exist which offer doctoral   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> degrees in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paleoanthropology.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) The US National Academy of Sciences has admitted   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paleoanthropologists to its ranks.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) Peer-reviewed research journals exist for   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paleoanthropology.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4) Few, if any, scientists dispute the fact that   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paleoanthropology is a valid science.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In spite of all that you say above, it is noted that   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you are at a complete loss of words when I ask   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you to tell us about any specific paleo-anthropological   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> discovery that shows that they have enlightened   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us about ~anything~...in your own words.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And you are a "complete loss of words"   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to tell us the age of the earth, or even   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us your opinion of it.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The earth as you know it was not until it was called   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> earth on the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3rd day of this realm. The planets stars, etc were not   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> until the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4th day of this realm. All this occurred around 6,000   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> years ago. In   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> literal time, not figurative nor theoretical.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why 6,000?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do you determine that date?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> What date? I mentioned time approximate.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> OK, "time approximate"   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Why 6000 years?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> What happened then?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And are their so called ""discoveries"" built upon   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scientific method, or are they built upon fantasy?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Those who want the truth do not accept stories that   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are built upon fantasy.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Modern Christian: Someone who believes   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in dragons, unicorns, talking snakes and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> transmutation (all mentioned in the Bible)   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but accuses those citing scientific data   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of "indulging in fantasies".   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then I do not fit your daffynition.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scientific data only recounts what is reversed   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> engineered, and from   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that understanding, some try to create variations based   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on the same   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things that always existed in the time of man, reshape,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and reuse,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and most generally it all contaminates the earth and its   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> environment.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What other data is there to   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> measure time but scientific data?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The universe expands at a known   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rate, the continents move at a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> known rate, starlight reaches our   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eyes at a known rate. If those   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> known rates are wrong what rates   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are right?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> If the continents moved at a known rate then there would   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> be no   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> earthquakes. All volcanos would erupt and known cycles and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> explosive   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rates.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> If such massive errors are made then what credibility does   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the rest of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> your statement have.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Science has recently recognized another light form, one   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that was   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> spoken of near 5,000 years ago + or - and they have yet to   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> determine   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> its parameters.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Where was this "spoken of" 5000 years ago?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Oh, the memories of my fundamentalist Christian childhood! Of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> course,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> my childhood occurred back in the 1980s, which, someday, may   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> become   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> known as the end of the "Information Dark Ages".   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Dawn   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Or more likely the beginning of the end of this age.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> you mean zombie jesus?   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> LOL!   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Yeah, Jesus' "imminent return" has been predicted for quite some   
   >>>>>>>>> time now!   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/   
   >>>>>>>>> Predictions_and_claims_for_the_Second_Coming   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Given the Second Law of Thermodynamics and the fact that Jesus'   
   >>>>>>>>> remains are in a highly advanced state of decomposition, I think   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|