XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.atheism, alt.religion.christian
From: none@none.non
On Sep 13, 2025, jojo wrote
(Message-ID:):
> None wrote:
> > On Sep 12, 2025, jojo wrote
> > (Message-ID:<40b4253c-cfab-c94e-400d-e6a5e4ed4743@shinku.aoyagi.konjou>):
> >
> > > None wrote:
> > > > On Sep 12, 2025, jojo wrote
> > > > (Message-ID:<7eda1708-e6d3-9729-9571-07b6d26f6447@shinku
aoyagi.konjou>):
> > > >
> > > > > None wrote:
> > > > > > On Sep 12, 2025, jojo wrote
> > > > > > (Message-ID:<06a0238b-feb9-9555-dd59-2b9bffd6e3a0@sh
nku.aoyagi.konjou>)
> > > > > > :
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Dawn Flood wrote:
> > > > > > > > On 9/12/2025 11:43 AM, jojo wrote:
> > > > > > > > > None wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > On Sep 12, 2025, Dawn Flood wrote
> > > > > > > > > > (Message-ID: <10a1e6t$3jm3q$2@dont-email.me>):
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On 9/12/2025 7:45 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > None wrote in
> > > > > > > > > > > > news:10a081v$366mu$1@dont-email.me:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sep 11, 2025, Mitchell Holman wrote
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (Message-ID: ):
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > None wrote in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > news:109vbc8$2tbin$1@dont-email.me:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sep 11, 2025, Mitchell Holman wrote
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (Message-ID: ):
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Andrew" wrote in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > news:rKAwQ.12261$7F4e.8283@fx05.ams4:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Dawn Flood" wrote in message
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > news:109tfa4$29gbi$1@dont-email.me...
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To sum-up, paleoanthropology is a valid
science, because,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) Major universities exist which offer
doctoral
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > degrees in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > paleoanthropology.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) The US National Academy of Sciences has
admitted
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > paleoanthropologists to its ranks.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3) Peer-reviewed research journals exist
for
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > paleoanthropology.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 4) Few, if any, scientists dispute the
fact that
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > paleoanthropology is a valid science.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In spite of all that you say above, it is
noted that
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you are at a complete loss of words when I
ask
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you to tell us about any specific
paleo-anthropological
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > discovery that shows that they have
enlightened
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > us about ~anything~...in your own words.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And you are a "complete loss of words"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to tell us the age of the earth, or even
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > us your opinion of it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The earth as you know it was not until it was
called
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth on the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3rd day of this realm. The planets stars, etc
were not
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > until the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 4th day of this realm. All this occurred around
6,000
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > years ago. In
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > literal time, not figurative nor theoretical.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why 6,000?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > How do you determine that date?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > What date? I mentioned time approximate.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > OK, "time approximate"
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Why 6000 years?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > What happened then?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And are their so called ""discoveries""
built upon
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > scientific method, or are they built upon
fantasy?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Those who want the truth do not accept
stories that
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are built upon fantasy.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Modern Christian: Someone who believes
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in dragons, unicorns, talking snakes and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > transmutation (all mentioned in the Bible)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but accuses those citing scientific data
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of "indulging in fantasies".
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Then I do not fit your daffynition.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Scientific data only recounts what is reversed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > engineered, and from
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that understanding, some try to create
variations based
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > on the same
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > things that always existed in the time of man,
reshape,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and reuse,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and most generally it all contaminates the earth
and its
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > environment.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > What other data is there to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > measure time but scientific data?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > The universe expands at a known
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > rate, the continents move at a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > known rate, starlight reaches our
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > eyes at a known rate. If those
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > known rates are wrong what rates
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > are right?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > If the continents moved at a known rate then there
would be no
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
