XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian   
   From: none@none.non   
      
   On Sep 13, 2025, Samuel Spade wrote   
   (Message-ID:):   
      
   > None wrote:   
   > > On Sep 13, 2025, Samuel Spade wrote   
   > > (Message-ID:):   
   > >   
   > > > "Andrew" wrote:   
   > > > > "None" wrote in message news:10a2v2e$5del$5@dont-email.me...   
   > > > > > Andrew wrote   
   > > > > > > "Dawn Flood" wrote:   
   > > > > > > > Andrew wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > "Dawn Flood" wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > > Andrew wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > > > "Dawn Flood" wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > > > > Andrew wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > paleo-anthropological discovery   
   > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > Toss "paleo-anthropological discoveries" into Google AI   
   and see   
   > > > > > > > > > > > what   
   > > > > > > > > > > > you get!   
   > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > You are at a complete loss of words to answer my question.   
   > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > But I hope you have a nice day.   
   > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > Bye!   
   > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > Here's the query, "paleo-anthropological discoveries",   
   followed by   
   > > > > > > > > > the   
   > > > > > > > > > Google AI response:   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > Thank you Dawn. Now can you point to any specific   
   > > > > > > > > paleo-anthropological discovery that shows that they   
   > > > > > > > > have enlightened us about any thing.....in your own   
   > > > > > > > > words?   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > No, but what you have done is, point us to the stories   
   > > > > > > > > that they told us that have deceived the gullible masses!   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > You cite them as if they were all truth. Not realizinng   
   > > > > > > > > that you have been~woefully deceived~along with all   
   > > > > > > > > the others!!!   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > You folks are so funny, and so 'easily deceived'. Lol!   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > Now, can you tell us...> which of their ""discoveries""   
   > > > > > > > > have been built upon the scientific method..rather than   
   > > > > > > > > upon their fantasies?   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > That the origins of all human beings can be traced back   
   > > > > > > > to Africa, which is where the first modern humans arose.   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > Yes, for man was created there, back in the Garden of Eden.   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > The location of the garden of eden was at the land of four   
   > > > > > rivers. It was next door to Persia   
   > > > >   
   > > > > Yes, and after the Flood humans came from where the Ark   
   > > > > landed.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > Paleo-anthropology purports to gives us "discoveries" that   
   > > > > agree with their a-priori philosophical script, rather than on   
   > > > > true, legitimate science.   
   > > >   
   > > > LOL! It's amazing that here in the 21st century, supposed grown adults   
   > > > believe in 1-week creation and The Flood. Then they try to convince   
   > > > atheists!   
   > > >   
   > > > Andrew & Robert, you guys are more fun than a barrel of monkeys.   
   > >   
   > > Science and history support the days of creations.   
   >   
   > Okay, I'll bite. I get to deny that, then you cite proof from true,   
   > non-looney science and history sources that supports the 6 day creation,   
   > and you can make me look like a damn fool. Ready?...   
   >   
   > No Rob, that's false. Science and history do not support the Genesis   
   > creation mythology.   
   >   
   > Waiting...   
   >   
   > > Plant life cannot survive   
   > > 24 hours without the Sun.   
   >   
   > Also false.   
      
   Then you are not knowledgeable about plant life and the total absence of   
   Light.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|