XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian   
   From: none@none.non   
      
   On Sep 13, 2025, Attila wrote   
   (Message-ID:<3blcck577s2bdnm06atb58v148ubl7o0nf@4ax.com>):   
      
   > On Sat, 13 Sep 2025 15:25:59 -0700, None in   
   > alt.atheism with message-id<10a4r1n$ok2p$2@dont-email.me>   
   > wrote:   
   >   
   > > On Sep 13, 2025, Attila wrote   
   > > (Message-ID:<3bkbckt2n02g98v0ojfg82n636bajq4q1i@4ax.com>):   
   > >   
   > > > On Sat, 13 Sep 2025 12:21:10 -0700, None in   
   > > > alt.atheism with message-id<10a4g76$krjv$3@dont-email.me>   
   > > > wrote:   
   > > >   
   > > > > On Sep 13, 2025, Kenito Benito wrote   
   > > > > (Message-ID:):   
   > > > >   
   > > > > > On Fri, 12 Sep 2025 19:26:11 -0700, "Andrew"   
   > > > > > wrote:   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > > "Dawn Flood" wrote in message news:10a2dt4$3cj$1@dont-email.me...   
   > > > > > > > Andrew wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > "Dawn Flood" wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > > Andrew wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > > > "Dawn Flood" wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > > > > Andrew wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > paleo-anthropological discovery   
   > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > Toss "paleo-anthropological discoveries" into Google AI   
   and see   
   > > > > > > > > > > > what   
   > > > > > > > > > > > you get!   
   > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > You are at a complete loss of words to answer my question.   
   > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > But I hope you have a nice day.   
   > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > Bye!   
   > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > Here's the query, "paleo-anthropological discoveries",   
   followed by   
   > > > > > > > > > the   
   > > > > > > > > > Google AI response:   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > Thank you Dawn. Now can you point to any specific   
   > > > > > > > > paleo-anthropological discovery that shows that they   
   > > > > > > > > have enlightened us about any thing.....in your own   
   > > > > > > > > words?   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > No, but what you have done is, point us to the stories   
   > > > > > > > > that they told us that have deceived the gullible masses!   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > You cite them as if they were all truth. Not realizinng   
   > > > > > > > > that you have been~woefully deceived~along with all   
   > > > > > > > > the others!!!   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > You folks are so funny, and so 'easily deceived'. Lol!   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > Now, can you tell us...> which of their ""discoveries""   
   > > > > > > > > have been built upon the scientific method..rather than   
   > > > > > > > > upon their fantasies?   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > That the origins of all human beings can be traced back   
   > > > > > > > to Africa, which is where the first modern humans arose.   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > Yes, for man was created there, back in the Garden of Eden.   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > Can you cite the peer reviewed evidence, or any actual evidence,   
   > > > > > that the Garden of Eden ever existed, and that is where man was   
   > > > > > created? If not, you're just gullible, according to your own   
   > > > > > standards.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > LOL, everything in the Bible is peer reviewed.   
   > > >   
   > > > By who? Where?   
   > >   
   > > By its peers wherever they dwelt or currently dwell.   
   >   
   > Not an answer. Be specific.   
      
   Do you really lack the power of reason?   
   >   
   >   
   > > Its peers are peers, just like peers in psychology fields need to be peers   
   > > of the respective fields in order to understand what was written.   
   >   
   > As usual your so-called "evidence" requires a belief in your   
   > silly superstition to be accepted.   
      
   I answered the question of peer review, I also gave and example of it, that   
   meets the requirements of“peer” review. Something that you all say that   
   you understand what it means as well as the process thereof, yet cannot   
   fathom what it is   
      
   Here is definition, in other words, of peer review within believers   
   community, from the Bible.   
      
   “Let two or three prophets speak, and let the others judge.” (1Co 14:29)   
      
   Something that many religious ‘christians’ cannot accept of believe as   
   they seek the preeminence amongst men.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|