XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian   
   From: none@none.non   
      
   On Sep 13, 2025, Attila wrote   
   (Message-ID:<3klcck123b2m3s7pf740oj6um3tuh1n0ss@4ax.com>):   
      
   > On Sat, 13 Sep 2025 22:15:23 -0700, None  in   
   > alt.atheism with message-id<10a5j1b$v3bm$6@dont-email.me>   
   > wrote:   
   >   
   > > On Sep 13, 2025, Samuel Spade wrote   
   > > (Message-ID:):   
   > >   
   > > > None   wrote:   
   > > > > On Sep 12, 2025, Samuel Spade wrote   
   > > > > (Message-ID:<415ackd3pmqn6hhtfgtifth1hqhrfn5ogg@4ax.com>):   
   > > > >   
   > > > > > None   wrote:   
   > > > > > > On Sep 12, 2025, Dawn Flood wrote   
   > > > > > > (Message-ID:<10a2dt4$3cj$1@dont-email.me>):   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > (snip)   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > That the origins of all human beings can be traced back to   
   Africa,   
   > > > > > > > which   
   > > > > > > > is where the first modern humans arose.   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > That is a total rewrite of Human history, migratory patterns, etc,   
   even   
   > > > > > > DNA   
   > > > > > > disproves that thinking. And so does the DNA and genomes of chimps   
   and   
   > > > > > > humans.   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > You are confusing Bible mythology with human history. The Bible is   
   not   
   > > > > > a history book.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > Your assumptions does not truth make. Assumptions of this sort are   
   based   
   > > > > on ignorance whether willful or or simple lack of knowledge.   
   > > >   
   > > > You didn't know there's a huge body of recorded knowledge that's not   
   > > > based on the bible at all? Much of it is personal eyewitness info from   
   > > > persons of known identity, unlike the bible. That's not assumptions, Mr.   
   > > > Assumer.   
   > >   
   > > The subject you were replying about was the Bible which you called a   
   > > mythology out of sheer ignorance.   
   >   
   > Where is it verified by unambiguous, unrelated, verifiable   
   > and credible evidence?   
      
   I think you are speaking on another topic. The evidence of his subject is at   
   the beginning of his post here.   
   >   
   >   
   > > Then you wandered off, shifting the goal posts with yet more assumptions.   
   > >   
   > > > And that body of knowledge has few points of agreement with the bible.   
   > >   
   > > Why would it? You really need to go to school and learn about history, and   
   > > historians.   
   >   
   > History and historians look for unambiguous, unrelated,   
   > verifiable and credible evidence to support their findings.   
      
   LOL, then a full 98% + of historical records do not meet your requirements.   
   Which BTW the resulting product of that is that you have no historical   
   records to bank on.