XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy
XPost: alt.religion.christian
From: none@none.non
On Sep 14, 2025, Attila wrote
(Message-ID:):
> On Sun, 14 Sep 2025 00:28:04 -0700, None in
> alt.atheism with message-id<10a5qq4$12pq4$4@dont-email.me>
> wrote:
>
> > On Sep 13, 2025, Attila wrote
> > (Message-ID:):
> >
> > > On Sat, 13 Sep 2025 21:07:52 -0700, "Andrew"
> > > in alt.atheism with message-id
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
> > > > news:XnsB359D30E5B5EB629555@69.80.101.20...
> > > > > "Andrew" wrote:
> > > > > > "Mitchell Holman" wrote:
> > > > > > > "Andrew" wrote:
> > > > > > > > "None" wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Andrew wrote
> > > > > > > > > > "Dawn Flood" wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > Andrew wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > "Dawn Flood" wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Andrew wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Dawn Flood" wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Andrew wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > paleo-anthropological discovery
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Toss "paleo-anthropological discoveries" into
Google AI
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and see what you get!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > You are at a complete loss of words to answer my
question.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > But I hope you have a nice day.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bye!
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Here's the query, "paleo-anthropological
discoveries",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > followed by the Google AI response:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you Dawn. Now can you point to any specific
> > > > > > > > > > > > paleo-anthropological discovery that shows that they
> > > > > > > > > > > > have enlightened us about any thing.....in your own
> > > > > > > > > > > > words?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > No, but what you have done is, point us to the stories
> > > > > > > > > > > > that they told us that have deceived the gullible
masses!
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > You cite them as if they were all truth. Not realizinng
> > > > > > > > > > > > that you have been~woefully deceived~along with all
> > > > > > > > > > > > the others!!!
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > You folks are so funny, and so 'easily deceived'. Lol!
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Now, can you tell us...> which of their
""discoveries""
> > > > > > > > > > > > have been built upon the scientific method..rather than
> > > > > > > > > > > > upon their fantasies?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > That the origins of all human beings can be traced back
> > > > > > > > > > > to Africa, which is where the first modern humans arose.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Yes, for man was created there, back in the Garden of Eden.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The location of the garden of eden was at the land of four
> > > > > > > > > rivers. It was next door to Persia
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Yes, and after the Flood humans came from where the Ark landed.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If all humans came from the
> > > > > > > Noah family where did the different
> > > > > > > races of people come from?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Genetic diversity and geographic isolation.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > There is no genetic diversity
> > > > > within a family. They aall share
> > > > > the SAME genes from the SAME sources.
> > > >
> > > > As years and decades go on, populations
> > > > become isolated from those in other parts
> > > > of the world.
> > >
> > > Irrelevant. There is still a population of unrelated
> > > individuals. BTW, DNA analysis will include the part of the
> > > world your ancestors came from.
> > >
> > > BTW, While a few individuals can technically reproduce, a
> > > sustainable human population needs a significant number to
> > > maintain genetic diversity and long-term health, with
> > > estimates for a healthy, self-sustaining population ranging
> > > from 160 to 500 or more, depending on factors like genetic
> > > diversity, technological intervention, and time scale. The
> > > 50/500 rule, developed for biological populations, suggests
> > > 50 individuals are needed to avoid inbreeding and 500 for
> > > long-term evolutionary adaptation, a benchmark that can be
> > > adjusted for humans with careful genetic management.
> >
> > Where was there technology 3, 4 or t thousand years ago?
>
> What technology was involved?
This is what you said, hence my question.
*************************************
> > > depending on factors like genetic
> > > diversity, technological intervention, and time scale. The
> > > 50/500 rule, developed for biological populations, *******
*****************************
>
>
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > That is where inbreeding and genetic
> > > > > diseases come from.
> > > > >
> > > > > But tell us: How could the
> > > > > Noah family reproduce itself
> > > > > without a WHOLE lot of incest
> > > > > going on?
> > > >
> > > > The same factors as existed with the
> > > > children of Adam. At that time there
> > > > was genetic purity, no defects.
> > >
> > > And the same problems existed, which is an excellent
> > > argument against that legend being a myth.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
