[continued from previous message]   
      
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > Reverse engineering from what to what? How do you   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > know the order hasn't always been there?   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > That is what I said, the order of this realm was   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > there all along, ever since it was made.   
   > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > No, I mean without it ever being made.   
   > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you know anything about reverse engineering?   
   > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > Reverse engineering is when you figure out   
   > > > > > > > > > > > something's design by studying its function. What   
   > > > > > > > > > > > does that have to do with the "realm" of science?   
   > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is another realm to which none of these   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > laws of order apply. Yet like   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > anhydrous ammonia and water can dwell together   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in the same physical space, so can the two   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > realms exist. Water being   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > similar to the elements of this realm.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you have any scientific knowledge you should   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > be able to understand that.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > What makes you think there is another realm?   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > I do not think it, I know it is real and exists,   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > something you all deny, yet you are affected by its   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > realty.   
   > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > What makes you think you know it's real? And how does   
   > > > > > > > > > > > that affect the rest of us?   
   > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > You have totally lost your trolling touch.   
   > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > I had to laugh at some of your   
   > > > > > > > > > > comments/questions/reasonings.   
   > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > you are out of phase, even with your own statements.   
   > > > > > > > > > > That is sad to see. :(   
   > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > This is how all arguments with Christians end.   
   > > > > > > > > > They toss out some claims, you ask intelligent   
   > > > > > > > > > questions about them, they ignore them, call   
   > > > > > > > > > you a troll and run away. As with Robert, as   
   > > > > > > > > > with Andrew, as with this “None”.   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > ROTFLOL You consider your questions intelligent? Based upon   
   > > > > > > > > what? Ego? A point to argue that is based on foolishness?   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > Your claim:   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > The earth as you know it was not until it was called earth   
   > > > > > > > > on the 3rd day of this realm. The planets stars, etc were   
   > > > > > > > > not until the 4th day of this realm. All this occurred   
   > > > > > > > > around 6,000 years ago.   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > I just asked what happened 6009   
   > > > > > > > years ago and where does the Bible   
   > > > > > > > say that.   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > You need to learn in order to have knowledge, and then use   
   > > > > > > > > that knowledge to come up with a well defined question that   
   > > > > > > > > is not based on foolish assumptions or old wives tales. If   
   > > > > > > > > you ask a question to learn something so that you are no   
   > > > > > > > > longer ignorant of that topic, then the answer will stick   
   > > > > > > > > in your mind forever which may lead to further questions   
   > > > > > > > > once the door of knowledge was opened to you and you   
   > > > > > > > > received it.   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > If you asked the same question over and over again, it   
   > > > > > > > > shows that you were unable to comprehend it or willingly   
   > > > > > > > > denied the answer showing that you asked without the desire   
   > > > > > > > > to learn, commonly thought of as troll speak.   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > The Bible makes no mention of ANYTHING   
   > > > > > > > happening 6000 years ago. Since you claim   
   > > > > > > > it does could you share a Bible passage or   
   > > > > > > > two on this point?   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > Mitch,   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > You're "arguing" with someone who is in the same category as   
   > > > > > > those who believe that the South won the American Civil War.   
   > > > > > > Maybe he's (she's?) real, a bot, a Russian troll ("Comrade?"),   
   > > > > > > or something else. Perhaps, "laisse passer" on this one?!   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > Dawn   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > Dawn, not only was he shown the events and historical evidences   
   > > > > > that lead up to the understanding, like you he has read the   
   > > > > > Bible, Yes, I realize that many people have read it, found it was   
   > > > > > a chore, or hard to understand the old English language. But all   
   > > > > > that changes once a person is Born Again of God. Then their whole   
   > > > > > aspect of it changes immediately.   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > I know this from a personal standpoint when God became a reality   
   > > > > > to me, in this life.   
   > > >   
   > > > This is the same tactic Robert   
   > > > uses, the "God spoke to me and said   
   > > > I was right and you are wrong".   
   > > >   
   > > >   
   > > > I always wonder how mamy women   
   > > > were burned to death by Christians   
   > > > claiming "God spoke to me and told   
   > > > me they were witches”.   
   > >   
   > > That happened many times by many so-called christians. They were not   
   > > of God and under the NT covenant it was not condoned.   
   >   
   > So you are "of God" but others   
   > claiming to be "of God" are not really   
   > "of God". See the problem?   
      
   Yes, you read assuming and not by understanding.   
   >   
   >   
   > > I never used that tactic. The word of God is right in all things.   
   >   
   > So when God orders people to be killed   
   > for doing something we should do that, no?   
      
   No. And that answer only adds to your confused state of mind.   
   >   
   >   
   > > That   
   > > I told you or another person what the scripture says that Gods will   
   > > and desires are, is not my words but His and I fully respect and honor   
   > > HIM and would never take credit from Him.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)