XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy
XPost: alt.religion.christian
From: none@none.non
On Sep 14, 2025, Kenito Benito wrote
(Message-ID:<9h6dck1dkg4ac33o14ioqqupojn1rr3k4l@4ax.com>):
> On Sat, 13 Sep 2025 11:45:09 -0700, None wrote:
>
> > On Sep 13, 2025, Kenito Benito wrote
> > (Message-ID:):
> >
> > > On Sat, 13 Sep 2025 03:55:14 +0000, jojo wrote:
> > >
> > > > Andrew wrote:
> > > > > "Dawn Flood" wrote in message news:10a2dt4$3cj$1@dont-email.me...
> > > > > > Andrew wrote:
> > > > > > > "Dawn Flood" wrote:
> > > > > > > > Andrew wrote:
> > > > > > > > > "Dawn Flood" wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Andrew wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > paleo-anthropological discovery
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Toss "paleo-anthropological discoveries" into Google AI and
> > > > > > > > > > see what you get!
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > You are at a complete loss of words to answer my question.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > But I hope you have a nice day.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Bye!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Here's the query, "paleo-anthropological discoveries",
> > > > > > > > followed by the Google AI response:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thank you Dawn. Now can you point to any specific
> > > > > > > paleo-anthropological discovery that shows that they
> > > > > > > have enlightened us about any thing.....in your own
> > > > > > > words?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > No, but what you have done is, point us to the stories
> > > > > > > that they told us that have deceived the gullible masses!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You cite them as if they were all truth. Not realizinng
> > > > > > > that you have been~woefully deceived~along with all
> > > > > > > the others!!!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You folks are so funny, and so 'easily deceived'. Lol!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Now, can you tell us...> which of their ""discoveries""
> > > > > > > have been built upon the scientific method..rather than
> > > > > > > upon their fantasies?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > That the origins of all human beings can be traced back
> > > > > > to Africa, which is where the first modern humans arose.
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, for man was created there, back in the Garden of Eden.
> > > >
> > > > you know the one thing about that which makes no sense? it makes
> > > > us all super inbred.
> > >
> > > Something I would like to be explained is why Cain was worried
> > > someone would kill him for his murder of Abel. Since there was only
> > > Adam, Eve and their children, who were these other people that cause
> > > Cain to fear them?
> > > Did the God of the Bible create other humans that he placed in
> > > other areas? He must have. But if the Bible is to be believed, there
> > > was only Adam and Eve until they left the Garden. Then they had
> > > children.
> > > Maybe some of the kids took off to make their way in the world.
> > > There is no mention of this, so anyone who accepts the Bible as valid
> > > would dismiss that as a realistic possibility.
> > > This also will mean all of Adam's and Eve's children had to
> > > procreate with their siblings.
> >
> > Yes, they did. They were descendants of a perfectly constructed being, and
> > so
> > their descendants were from the same stock.
>
> So God paused the genetic problems of continued incest?
I am sorry. But I have had enough of ridiculous suppositions.
>
>
> > They deteriorated genetically over time due to the fall of Adam and as a
> > consequence of sin entering this world. That is the results of the Evil one
> > who said “I will be as God” and he is the source of all that is bad
upon
> > this earth, sickness, disease, the flaws of mankind, etc. Even today many
> > incestuous relationship produce viable human beings,
>
> The first generation or two may not have any significant
> deformities. But by the time we got to where we are, the generic
> abnormalities would be so pronounced, we would be lucky to function.
>
> > and also those that have
> > had distinctive flaws or maladies will transmit them to their heirs. In the
> > cases here in America there are “tribes” of peoples like say the Amish
> > and other similar people, who have distinctive characteristics that lead to
> > physical maladies, problems, that they cannot escape because in effect they
> > show the signs of incestuous effects.
>
> Which supports the idea that humans did not, and cannot,
> originate from just one male and one female as the Bible claims.
>
> > The tribes of many peoples who are not
> > bound together because of beliefs marry in large part with peoples from
> > other
> > tribes, for various reasons, and in do doing introduce ‘fresh blood’
> > into
> > their tribe.
>
> If the Bible is to be believed, this cannot have happened. There
> was no "fresh blood" to introduce.
>
> >
> > > The negative results in incestuous
> > > offspring is well known. So, if the tale were true, we probably
> > > wouldn't exist. We would have gotten so bad that humans would have
> > > died out.
> >
> > We all are a result of these things. So much so that certain maladies will
> > occur that are distinctive enough that names are given them which are based
> > on the genes of a female when impregnated by a male with certain genes the
> > result of which a child will be born with certain ‘defects’ the most
> > serious or troubling of which have been identified and a geneticist while
> > tell you that somewhere in your bloodline that you two were directly
> > related.
> > While it may not affect all your future children the probabilities of it
are
> > there.
>
> I can accept a common ancestor, as you prove you do. But Adam and
> Eve will not be one.
>
> >
> > For that reason to ensure ones offspring will have no issues is to have a
> > provable genealogy, one not based on hearsay or hopes trying to be tied to
> > persons of note, as well as a through genetic and DNA search on both
> > parties,
> > all cross linked as much as possible to see the possible variants in order
> > to
> > ensure a high likelihood on ’normal’ children with intelligence and the
> > ability to reason. The cost of doing so is rather high so most people do
not
> > have the means to do so and they take their chances, especially the young,
> > who are the most likely to overlook signs that they should have seen. This
> > is
> > why reasonable parents choosing the mates is not a bad thing, unless they
do
> > so for selfish self promoting reasons.
>
> I didn't, and wouldn't, try to pick my children's partners. They
> aren't stupid, and were raised to be able to make their own choices.
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
