XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian   
   From: none@none.non   
      
   On Sep 14, 2025, Attila wrote   
   (Message-ID:):   
      
   > On Sun, 14 Sep 2025 12:35:26 -0700, None  in   
   > alt.atheism with message-id<10a75dt$1fga8$3@dont-email.me>   
   > wrote:   
   >   
   > > On Sep 13, 2025, Attila wrote   
   > > (Message-ID:<3blcck577s2bdnm06atb58v148ubl7o0nf@4ax.com>):   
   > >   
   > > > On Sat, 13 Sep 2025 15:25:59 -0700, None  in   
   > > > alt.atheism with message-id<10a4r1n$ok2p$2@dont-email.me>   
   > > > wrote:   
   > > >   
   > > > > On Sep 13, 2025, Attila wrote   
   > > > > (Message-ID:<3bkbckt2n02g98v0ojfg82n636bajq4q1i@4ax.com>):   
   > > > >   
   > > > > > On Sat, 13 Sep 2025 12:21:10 -0700, None  in   
   > > > > > alt.atheism with message-id<10a4g76$krjv$3@dont-email.me>   
   > > > > > wrote:   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > > On Sep 13, 2025, Kenito Benito wrote   
   > > > > > > (Message-ID:):   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > On Fri, 12 Sep 2025 19:26:11 -0700, "Andrew"   
   > > > > > > >   wrote:   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > "Dawn Flood" wrote in message news:10a2dt4$3cj$1   
   dont-email.me...   
   > > > > > > > > > Andrew wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > > > "Dawn Flood" wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > > > > Andrew wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > "Dawn Flood" wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > Andrew wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > paleo-anthropological discovery   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > Toss "paleo-anthropological discoveries" into Google   
   AI and see   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > what   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > you get!   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > You are at a complete loss of words to answer my   
   question.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > But I hope you have a nice day.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > Bye!   
   > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > Here's the query, "paleo-anthropological discoveries",   
   followed by   
   > > > > > > > > > > > the   
   > > > > > > > > > > > Google AI response:   
   > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > Thank you Dawn. Now can you point to any specific   
   > > > > > > > > > > paleo-anthropological discovery that shows that they   
   > > > > > > > > > > have enlightened us about any thing.....in your own   
   > > > > > > > > > > words?   
   > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > No, but what you have done is, point us to the stories   
   > > > > > > > > > > that they told us that have deceived the gullible masses!   
   > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > You cite them as if they were all truth. Not realizinng   
   > > > > > > > > > > that you have been~woefully deceived~along with all   
   > > > > > > > > > > the others!!!   
   > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > You folks are so funny, and so 'easily deceived'. Lol!   
   > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > Now, can you tell us...>  which of their ""discoveries""   
   > > > > > > > > > > have been built upon the scientific method..rather than   
   > > > > > > > > > > upon their fantasies?   
   > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > That the origins of all human beings can be traced back   
   > > > > > > > > > to Africa, which is where the first modern humans arose.   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > Yes, for man was created there, back in the Garden of Eden.   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > Can you cite the peer reviewed evidence, or any actual evidence,   
   > > > > > > > that the Garden of Eden ever existed, and that is where man was   
   > > > > > > > created? If not, you're just gullible, according to your own   
   > > > > > > > standards.   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > LOL, everything in the Bible is peer reviewed.   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > By who? Where?   
   > > > >   
   > > > > By its peers wherever they dwelt or currently dwell.   
   > > >   
   > > > Not an answer. Be specific.   
   > >   
   > > Do you really lack the power of reason?   
   >   
   > Do you lack the power of comprehension? Do you know what   
   > peer review is?   
      
   I asked you that.   
   >   
   >   
   > > >   
   > > >   
   > > > > Its peers are peers, just like peers in psychology fields need to be   
   peers   
   > > > > of the respective fields in order to understand what was written.   
   > > >   
   > > > As usual your so-called "evidence" requires a belief in your   
   > > > silly superstition to be accepted.   
   > >   
   > > I answered the question of peer review, I also gave and example of it, that   
   > > meets the requirements of“peer” review. Something that you all say that   
   > > you understand what it means as well as the process thereof, yet cannot   
   > > fathom what it is   
   > >   
   > > Here is definition, in other words, of peer review within believers   
   > > community, from the Bible.   
   >   
   > And there you go. First you must be a believer.   
      
   To judge a believer and be a peer, then? - - - -   
   >   
   >   
   > Analysis by a non-believer is not allowed.   
      
   To a very limited sense when speaking of the scriptures. For that reason I   
   use the word ignorance, not as a slight but of position.   
   >   
   >   
   > >   
   > > “Let two or three prophets speak, and let the others judge.” (1Co   
   14:29)   
   > >   
   > > Something that many religious ‘christians’ cannot accept of believe as   
   > > they seek the preeminence amongst men.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)