XPost: sci.skeptic, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy
XPost: alt.religion.christian
From: sam@spade.invalid
None wrote:
> On Sep 14, 2025, Samuel Spade wrote
> (Message-ID:):
>
> > None wrote:
> > > On Sep 13, 2025, Samuel Spade wrote
> > > (Message-ID:<5njcck575u9snon751caietialq248r13j@4ax.com>):
> > >
> > > > None wrote:
> > > > > On Sep 13, 2025, Samuel Spade wrote
> > > > > (Message-ID:):
> > > > >
> > > > > > None wrote:
> > > > > > > On Sep 13, 2025, Attila wrote
> > > > > > > (Message-ID:<3bkbckt2n02g98v0ojfg82n636bajq4q1i@4ax.com>):
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Sat, 13 Sep 2025 12:21:10 -0700, None in
> > > > > > > > alt.atheism with message-id<10a4g76$krjv$3@dont-email.me>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Sep 13, 2025, Kenito Benito wrote
> > > > > > > > > (Message-ID:):
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Can you cite the peer reviewed evidence, or any actual
evidence,
> > > > > > > > > > that the Garden of Eden ever existed, and that is where
man was
> > > > > > > > > > created? If not, you're just gullible, according to your
own
> > > > > > > > > > standards.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > LOL, everything in the Bible is peer reviewed.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > By who? Where?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > By its peers wherever they dwelt or currently dwell.
> > > > > > > Its peers are peers, just like peers in psychology fields need
to be
> > > > > > > peers
> > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > the respective fields in order to understand what was written.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Bible's peers are established characters like the Quran, the
> > > > > > Bhagavad Gita, and "Dianetics". They blessed the Holy Scripture and
> > > > > > stamped it with their Impramatur.
> > > > >
> > > > > Wrong, spoken from total ignorance. Like a chemist peer reviewing
> > > > > astronomy.
> > > >
> > > > Then you tell me, who are the Bible's peers?
> > >
> > > Every book in the OT was peer reviewed for over 1,000 years initially by
the
> > > tribe of Levites as well as all the prophets and has been reviewed since
by
> > > the peoples of God.
The peers of the anonymous authors of the OT would be...
more anonymous authors writing reviews. Of course!
> > The older books of the OT were passed orally for centuries before being
> > written down. None of the OT was written down before the 10th century
> > BCE at the earliest. Most of it was written during or after the
> > Babylonian exile. The Torah didn't reach its final form until that
> > time.
>
> Exo 24:4 And Moses wrote all the words of the LORD, and rose up early in the
So Moses was a scribe. Doesn't make him the author.
Do you think Moses wrote this?:
Deuteronomy 34:5 "So Moses the servant of the Lord died there in the
land of Moab, according to the word of the Lord. 6 And he buried him in
a valley in the land of Moab, over against Bethpeor: but no man knoweth
of his sepulchre unto this day."
Did Moses describe his own death and burial?
Notice "unto this day". The author seems to be writing a long, long
time after Moses was laid to rest.
(snip more meaningless verses)
> > Everything in the OT is anonymous.
>
> Is there any reason I should continue on in this post given your knowledge?
No, give up your vain argument. I am happy for you that you have
realized the folly of your ways.
> > Yes, the NT was reviewed and revised before the books were widely
> > circulated, by anonymous authors and anonymous editors. The Gospels
> > were written to conform with earlier prophecies like Isaiah and Daniel.
> > Virgin birth, Bethleham, crucifixion, and many other modifications were
> > made to support the messianic narrative.
> >
> > Then everything was rearranged again at the Council of Nicea in the 4th
> > century.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
